sanskrit-lexicon / MWinflect

Generate declensions and conjugations based upon words in MW1899 dictionary.
1 stars 0 forks source link

Nominals of 1 stem ending in sibilant #47

Open funderburkjim opened 5 years ago

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

For a general discussion of declension of the nominals ending in consonants and declined with the '1-stem' models, see #41.

From analyze_1cons.txt we extract the following frequency information for nominals ending in a sibilant and declined with the '1-stem' models.

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Case of final consonant S (palatal sibilant)

These are similar to the cases of a final palatal consonant of the c-varga #45. The m1s (masculine nominative singular) ending changes from S to either k or w, depending on the word.

Based on MW, Deshpande, or Kale, the m1s changes to k for:

The same sources mention that the m1s of the following end in w:

There are several additional MW nominals ending in S. Our declensions assume that the 1s ends in w for these; this default value is partially supported by Kale's statement under rAj (p. 58) that the declension is similar to rAj for ... root nouns in *C, S, z and h* .

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

The case of final consonant S and m1s ends in k

The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of m_1_S dfS

Case S D P
Nominative dfk dfSO dfSaH
Accusative dfSam dfSO dfSaH
Instrumental dfSA dfgByAm dfgBiH
Dative dfSe dfgByAm dfgByaH
Ablative dfSaH dfgByAm dfgByaH
Genitive dfSaH dfSoH dfSAm
Locative dfSi dfSoH dfkzu
Vocative dfk dfSO dfSaH

For the neuter n_1_S model of dfS, cases 1,2, and 8 are: dfk dfSI dfYSi and the other cases are as for m_1_S model. (This is speculative; no specific example found in references.)

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

The case of final consonant S and m1s ends in w

The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of m_1_S viS

Case S D P
Nominative viw viSO viSaH
Accusative viSam viSO viSaH
Instrumental viSA viqByAm viqBiH
Dative viSe viqByAm viqByaH
Ablative viSaH viqByAm viqByaH
Genitive viSaH viSoH viSAm
Locative viSi viSoH viwsu
Vocative viw viSO viSaH

For the neuter n_1_S model of viS, cases 1,2, and 8 are: viw viSI viYSi and the other cases are as for m_1_S model. (Inferred from example prAS, Kale p. 60.)

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Case of nominals ending in kz

Regarding declension process, there seem to be two categories of nominals ending in z:

Based on Kale's partial example of vivikz on p. 58, here are our rules for decline nominals ending in kz: The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of m_1_z vivikz

Case S D P
Nominative vivik vivikzO vivikzaH
Accusative vivikzam vivikzO vivikzaH
Instrumental vivikzA vivigByAm vivigBiH
Dative vivikze vivigByAm vivigByaH
Ablative vivikzaH vivigByAm vivigByaH
Genitive vivikzaH vivikzoH vivikzAm
Locative vivikzi vivikzoH vivikzu
Vocative vivik vivikzO vivikzaH

For the neuter n_1_z model of vivikz, cases 1,2, and 8 are: vivik vivikzI viviNkzi and the other cases are as for m_1_z model. (This is speculative - no printed examples found for neuter ending in kz.)

Notes:

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Case of nominals ending in vowel+z, with m1s ending in k.

Only 1 example was found: Dfz (in compound da-Dfz); both MW and Kale affirm m1s as daDfk.

Based on Kale's partial example of daDfz on p. 58, here are our rules for decline nominals ending in vowel + z: The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of m_1_z da-Dfz

Case 1: daDfk daDfzO daDfzaH Case 2: daDfzam daDfzO daDfzaH Case 3: daDfzA daDfgByAm daDfgBiH Case 4: daDfze daDfgByAm daDfgByaH Case 5: daDfzaH daDfgByAm daDfgByaH Case 6: daDfzaH daDfzoH daDfzAm Case 7: daDfzi daDfzoH daDfkzu Case 8: daDfk daDfzO daDfzaH

For the neuter n_1_z model of daDfz, cases 1,2, and 8 are: daDfk daDfzI daDfNzi and the other cases are as for m_1_z model. (This is speculative.)

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Case of nominals ending in vowel+z, with m1s ending in w.

There are several nominals ending in vowel+z, which MW and/or Kale confirms as having m1s ending in w:

Also there are several other headwords ending in vowel+z with no specific mention of the m1s ending. By the comment of Kale on p. 58 under rAj (See above re S-ending nominals), we infer that the default m1s ending is w, and so treat this group

Based on Kale's partial example of tviz on p. 59, here are our rules for declining these nominals ending in vowel + z: The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of m_1_z tviz

Case S D P
Nominative tviw tvizO tvizaH
Accusative tvizam tvizO tvizaH
Instrumental tvizA tviqByAm tviqBiH
Dative tvize tviqByAm tviqByaH
Ablative tvizaH tviqByAm tviqByaH
Genitive tvizaH tvizoH tvizAm
Locative tvizi tvizoH tviwsu
Vocative tviw tvizO tvizaH

For the neuter n_1_z model of tviz, cases 1,2, and 8 are tviw tvizI tviNzi; and the other cases are as for m_1_z model. (This is speculative.)

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Case of nominals ending in s

These remaining 1-stem s-ending words we divide into these categories for the purpose of declension:

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Case of nominals ending in As

Kale (p. 68) provides the declension of BAs (f.), and we assume this model applies to the other nouns ending in As.

The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of f_1_s BAs

Case S D P
Nominative BAH BAsO BAsaH
Accusative BAsam BAsO BAsaH
Instrumental BAsA BAByAm BABiH
Dative BAse BAByAm BAByaH
Ablative BAsaH BAByAm BAByaH
Genitive BAsaH BAsoH BAsAm
Locative BAsi BAsoH BAssu
Vocative BAH BAsO BAsaH

The n_1_s model for cases 1,2,8 gives BAH BAsI BAnsi; the other cases like f_1_s model. This is speculative.

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Declension of m_1_s dos

This declension is inferred from the partial example of Kale, p. 67. Kale shows doHzu as optional 7p form. MW also gives many of these forms.

Case S D P
Nominative doH dozO dozaH
Accusative dozam dozO dozaH
Instrumental dozA dorByAm dorBiH
Dative doze dorByAm dorByaH
Ablative dozaH dorByAm dorByaH
Genitive dozaH dozoH dozAm
Locative dozi dozoH dozzu
Vocative doH dozO dozaH

The n_1_s model for cases 1,2,8 gives doH dozI doMzi, in agreement with Kale.

The reason the final s changes to z before the vowels is due to the preceding 'o' -- not sure of the full statement of the sandhi rule that causes this change.

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Declension of m_1_s puMs

The declension for puMs (man) is provided by Kale (p. 69) and Bucknell (p. 93).

Case S D P
Nominative pumAn pumAMso pumAMsaH
Accusative pumAMsam pumAMsO puMsaH
Instrumental puMsA pumByAm pumBiH
Dative puMse pumByAm pumByaH
Ablative puMsaH pumByAm pumByaH
Genitive puMsaH puMsoH puMsAm
Locative puMsi puMsoH puMsu
Vocative puman pumAMso pumAMsaH

The n_1_s model for cases 1,2,8 gives pum puMsI pumAMsi, with the other cases like m_1_s model; this is in agreement with Kale.

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Declension of m_1_s hiMs

Case S D P
Nominative hin hiMsO hiMsaH
Accusative hiMsam hiMsO hiMsaH
Instrumental hiMsA hinByAm hinBiH
Dative hiMse hinByAm hinByaH
Ablative hiMsaH hinByAm hinByaH
Genitive hiMsaH hiMsoH hiMsAm
Locative hiMsi hiMsoH hinsu
Vocative hin hiMsO hiMsaH

The n_1_s model for cases 1,2,8 gives hin hiMsI hiMsi, with the other cases like m_1_s model.

Both m/f and n models are in agreement with the partial examples su-hiMs provided by Kale, p. 68.

The other two 'Ms'-ending words in MW are:

We assume their declensions follow the same pattern as hiMs.