Open funderburkjim opened 5 years ago
These are similar to the cases of a final palatal consonant of the c-varga #45. The m1s (masculine nominative singular) ending changes from S to either k or w, depending on the word.
Based on MW, Deshpande, or Kale, the m1s changes to k for:
The same sources mention that the m1s of the following end in w:
There are several additional MW nominals ending in S. Our declensions assume that the 1s ends in w for these; this default value is partially supported by Kale's statement under rAj (p. 58) that the declension is similar to rAj for ... root nouns in *C, S, z and h*
.
The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | dfk | dfSO | dfSaH |
Accusative | dfSam | dfSO | dfSaH |
Instrumental | dfSA | dfgByAm | dfgBiH |
Dative | dfSe | dfgByAm | dfgByaH |
Ablative | dfSaH | dfgByAm | dfgByaH |
Genitive | dfSaH | dfSoH | dfSAm |
Locative | dfSi | dfSoH | dfkzu |
Vocative | dfk | dfSO | dfSaH |
For the neuter n_1_S model of dfS, cases 1,2, and 8 are: dfk dfSI dfYSi
and the other cases are as for m_1_S model. (This is speculative; no specific example found in references.)
The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | viw | viSO | viSaH |
Accusative | viSam | viSO | viSaH |
Instrumental | viSA | viqByAm | viqBiH |
Dative | viSe | viqByAm | viqByaH |
Ablative | viSaH | viqByAm | viqByaH |
Genitive | viSaH | viSoH | viSAm |
Locative | viSi | viSoH | viwsu |
Vocative | viw | viSO | viSaH |
For the neuter n_1_S model of viS, cases 1,2, and 8 are: viw viSI viYSi and the other cases are as for m_1_S model. (Inferred from example prAS, Kale p. 60.)
Regarding declension process, there seem to be two categories of nominals ending in z:
Based on Kale's partial example of vivikz on p. 58, here are our rules for decline nominals ending in kz: The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | vivik | vivikzO | vivikzaH |
Accusative | vivikzam | vivikzO | vivikzaH |
Instrumental | vivikzA | vivigByAm | vivigBiH |
Dative | vivikze | vivigByAm | vivigByaH |
Ablative | vivikzaH | vivigByAm | vivigByaH |
Genitive | vivikzaH | vivikzoH | vivikzAm |
Locative | vivikzi | vivikzoH | vivikzu |
Vocative | vivik | vivikzO | vivikzaH |
For the neuter n_1_z model of vivikz, cases 1,2, and 8 are: vivik vivikzI viviNkzi and the other cases are as for m_1_z model. (This is speculative - no printed examples found for neuter ending in kz.)
Notes:
Only 1 example was found: Dfz (in compound da-Dfz); both MW and Kale affirm m1s as daDfk.
Based on Kale's partial example of daDfz on p. 58, here are our rules for decline nominals ending in vowel + z: The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case 1: daDfk daDfzO daDfzaH Case 2: daDfzam daDfzO daDfzaH Case 3: daDfzA daDfgByAm daDfgBiH Case 4: daDfze daDfgByAm daDfgByaH Case 5: daDfzaH daDfgByAm daDfgByaH Case 6: daDfzaH daDfzoH daDfzAm Case 7: daDfzi daDfzoH daDfkzu Case 8: daDfk daDfzO daDfzaH
For the neuter n_1_z model of daDfz, cases 1,2, and 8 are: daDfk daDfzI daDfNzi and the other cases are as for m_1_z model. (This is speculative.)
There are several nominals ending in vowel+z, which MW and/or Kale confirms as having m1s ending in w:
Also there are several other headwords ending in vowel+z with no specific mention of the m1s ending. By the comment of Kale on p. 58 under rAj (See above re S-ending nominals), we infer that the default m1s ending is w, and so treat this group
Based on Kale's partial example of tviz on p. 59, here are our rules for declining these nominals ending in vowel + z: The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | tviw | tvizO | tvizaH |
Accusative | tvizam | tvizO | tvizaH |
Instrumental | tvizA | tviqByAm | tviqBiH |
Dative | tvize | tviqByAm | tviqByaH |
Ablative | tvizaH | tviqByAm | tviqByaH |
Genitive | tvizaH | tvizoH | tvizAm |
Locative | tvizi | tvizoH | tviwsu |
Vocative | tviw | tvizO | tvizaH |
For the neuter n_1_z model of tviz, cases 1,2, and 8 are tviw tvizI tviNzi; and the other cases are as for m_1_z model. (This is speculative.)
These remaining 1-stem s-ending words we divide into these categories for the purpose of declension:
Kale (p. 68) provides the declension of BAs (f.), and we assume this model applies to the other nouns ending in As.
The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | BAH | BAsO | BAsaH |
Accusative | BAsam | BAsO | BAsaH |
Instrumental | BAsA | BAByAm | BABiH |
Dative | BAse | BAByAm | BAByaH |
Ablative | BAsaH | BAByAm | BAByaH |
Genitive | BAsaH | BAsoH | BAsAm |
Locative | BAsi | BAsoH | BAssu |
Vocative | BAH | BAsO | BAsaH |
The n_1_s model for cases 1,2,8 gives BAH BAsI BAnsi; the other cases like f_1_s model. This is speculative.
This declension is inferred from the partial example of Kale, p. 67. Kale shows doHzu as optional 7p form. MW also gives many of these forms.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | doH | dozO | dozaH |
Accusative | dozam | dozO | dozaH |
Instrumental | dozA | dorByAm | dorBiH |
Dative | doze | dorByAm | dorByaH |
Ablative | dozaH | dorByAm | dorByaH |
Genitive | dozaH | dozoH | dozAm |
Locative | dozi | dozoH | dozzu |
Vocative | doH | dozO | dozaH |
The n_1_s model for cases 1,2,8 gives doH dozI doMzi, in agreement with Kale.
The reason the final s changes to z before the vowels is due to the preceding 'o' -- not sure of the full statement of the sandhi rule that causes this change.
The declension for puMs (man) is provided by Kale (p. 69) and Bucknell (p. 93).
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | pumAn | pumAMso | pumAMsaH |
Accusative | pumAMsam | pumAMsO | puMsaH |
Instrumental | puMsA | pumByAm | pumBiH |
Dative | puMse | pumByAm | pumByaH |
Ablative | puMsaH | pumByAm | pumByaH |
Genitive | puMsaH | puMsoH | puMsAm |
Locative | puMsi | puMsoH | puMsu |
Vocative | puman | pumAMso | pumAMsaH |
The n_1_s model for cases 1,2,8 gives pum puMsI pumAMsi, with the other cases like m_1_s model; this is in agreement with Kale.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | hin | hiMsO | hiMsaH |
Accusative | hiMsam | hiMsO | hiMsaH |
Instrumental | hiMsA | hinByAm | hinBiH |
Dative | hiMse | hinByAm | hinByaH |
Ablative | hiMsaH | hinByAm | hinByaH |
Genitive | hiMsaH | hiMsoH | hiMsAm |
Locative | hiMsi | hiMsoH | hinsu |
Vocative | hin | hiMsO | hiMsaH |
The n_1_s model for cases 1,2,8 gives hin hiMsI hiMsi, with the other cases like m_1_s model.
Both m/f and n models are in agreement with the partial examples su-hiMs provided by Kale, p. 68.
The other two 'Ms'-ending words in MW are:
We assume their declensions follow the same pattern as hiMs.
For a general discussion of declension of the nominals ending in consonants and declined with the '1-stem' models, see #41.
From analyze_1cons.txt we extract the following frequency information for nominals ending in a sibilant and declined with the '1-stem' models.