Expanding abbreviations to number only references

[gasyoun]

http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/PWGScan/2013/web/webtc/indexcaller.php deva

In Ṛv. 7, 2, 8. Ushas 75, 7. Sarasvatî 2, 41, 17. we can propose that both 75, 7. and 2, 41, 17. should be Ṛv. . @drdhaval2785 do you agree? Do you agree that we can regex such cases to add at least metadata to number only references?

[gasyoun]

@fxru was not aware of https://nws.uzi.uni-halle.de/scribal_abbreviations?lang=en before, it's mix like https://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/PWScan/disp2/index.php was. @funderburkjim - now that is what one could call a good UI. We will get there one day.

[funderburkjim]

From the description of nws:

and perhaps more importantly, we have started to apply our own corrections to the data, which will thus fork into a new śākhā.

It would be good if we could fold such corrections into our PW digitization.

[gasyoun]

fold such corrections into our PW digitization.

I'll try to get in touch with them.

[funderburkjim]

I'll try to get in touch with them.

Thomas gave me a contact. Let me try that first.

[gasyoun]

Thomas gave me a contact

Good luck.

[funderburkjim]

Got reply from Prof. Slage. Will see how it develops.

[gasyoun]

Prof. Slage.

What's next step?

[funderburkjim]

He's communicating with IT people, I think, and will get back to me when it is convenient.

[drdhaval2785]

Any update @funderburkjim ?

[Andhrabharati]

With a similar work done in MW by @funderburkjim, this "number only references" can be closed.

[gasyoun]

@funderburkjim not all Mahabharata is linked and can we generate Ramayana links - I'll provide the targets with the help of Kate soon enough

[Andhrabharati]

He has already mentioned this, and kept it on his Todo list.

Probably best for me to do the 3rd item.

https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/PWG/issues/48#issuecomment-1023883669