crefminusbib, part 4

[drdhaval2785]

23 continued.

61

¯KA7C2.¯ZN. ¯P.@vEBujAgnaka@*vEBujAgnaka@107816:¯KA7C2. ‹zu› ¯P.:p:'u' typeset wrong as 'n'. Also wrong tagging.

See

Both print error and tagging error.

[drdhaval2785]

62

¯ed.Bomb@aYcana@*aYcana@1426:¯ed.Bomb:n:New resource. Actually this inherits 'R.' (for rAmAyaRa) from its predecessor.

This is a generic issue. In the present case, the tag ¯ed.Bomb actully inherits ¯R. from its predecessor. It would therefore stand for rAmAyaRa ed. Bomb.

Right now marking it as a nochange entry till we decide how to tackle it.

See

I am not sure how we should tackle such cases. Maybe @thomasincambodia would be the best person to throw light on how they handled such instances.

[drdhaval2785]

63

¯ZK ‹lesen›)@sku@sku@130331:‹zk lesen›):t:Not sure. But this is not a reference.

@gasyoun Please read the German. It seems that this is not a reference.

[drdhaval2785]

This issue turns out to be very tricky. All are different deep questions. 64

¯MALLIN. ‹zu› ¯KIR.@aparicita@aparicita@6129:¯MALLIN.‹zu›KIR.:t:I am also not sure. This is a new reference. How to deal with commentaries reference is something I need to understand.

@thomasincambodia How do we treat references like 'mallinATa on kirAtArjunIyam' ? The first is a person, but by the whole reference we get to understand 'mallinATa's commentary on kirAtArjunIyam'.

See

@funderburkjim In my opinion, the whole phrase should be considered a single reference. I think, because of intervening ‹zu› and ¯ of ¯KIR, we are getting two different references in pw.xml like <ls>MALLIN.</ls> <noti>zu</noti> <ls>KIR.3,2,21.</ls>.

[drdhaval2785]

65

¯GAUT.A7PAST.° #{pAvana}@paNktipAvana@paNktipAvana@61743:¯GAUT.A7PAST. #{°pAvana}:t:The item belongs to the next Devanagari sub entry.

As this issue is full of tricky questions, I close submissions in this issue here.

[funderburkjim]

@gasyoun @thomasincambodia Could 'zk lesen' in item 63 above be a print error for 'zu lesen' = 'to read' ?

[funderburkjim]

re 65 ¯GAUT.A7PAST.°

In addition to your correction, I'm viewing this as two references:

• GAUT = GAUTAMA'S DHARMAC2A7STRA
• A7PAST. == A7PASTAMBA'S DHARMASU7TRA,

[funderburkjim]

Here's the current way these are handled; refer to #27 for explanation of categories.

1. Typos/Print errors. These changes have not been installed yet

   ¯KA7C2.¯ZN. ¯P.@vEBujAgnaka@*vEBujAgnaka@107816:¯KA7C2. ‹zu› ¯P.:p:'u' typeset wrong as 'n'. Also wrong tagging.
   ; ejf: Could 'zk lesen' be a typo for 'zu lesen' = 'to read'  ?
   ¯ZK ‹lesen›)@sku@sku@130331:‹zk lesen›):t:Not sure. But this is not a reference.
   ¯GAUT.A7PAST.° #{pAvana}@paNktipAvana@paNktipAvana@61743:¯GAUT. ¯A7PAST. #{°pAvana}:t:The item belongs to the next Devanagari sub entry. Also, two references

2. Add to pwbib_new

   Adding to pwbib_new will remove this from our worry list for now.
   We may have to revisit how to handle this 
   ¯ed.Bomb@aYcana@*aYcana@1426:¯ed.Bomb:n:New resource. Actually this inherits 'R.' (for rAmAyaRa) from its predecessor.
   
   Similar rationale as above for putting this in pwbib_new for now.  It is 
   currently not clear whether there is a better solution.
   
   ¯MALLIN. ‹zu› ¯KIR.@aparicita@aparicita@6129:¯MALLIN.‹zu›KIR.:t:I am also not sure. This is a new reference. How to deal with commentaries reference is something I need to understand.

[funderburkjim]

corrections now installed.