Open gasyoun opened 10 years ago
Could you provide more details about which words appear (or not) in which dictionaries? I do not understand the question.
I meant PWK (= http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/PWScan/2014/web/webtc/indexcaller.php). I have explored a few cases. For example:
sumna
[L=127300] has — 2) m.
, but as per Nachträge (=Additions) it should have been — 2) n.
(lies n. st. m.
). Nachträge are included at end of a volume or as the 7th volume of PWK.
All corrections in pwk have been incorporated in SCH(midt). These should be linked to the original.
@thomasincambodia Why thank you, indeed, how could I forget. I checked http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/SCHScan/2014/web/webtc/indexcaller.php and got " sumná [L=26758] [p= 367-2] 2. lies n. statt m. 1" - that means if we would have a list of overlapping words in PWK and SCH - that would be a list of additions that needed to be made. But what about headwords, that have been fixed? How to detect them programmatically, to implement them in PWK?
Now that all the VN pages of pwk volumes got digitized (courtesy Jim & Thomas), various issues on pwkvn and SCH could be closed now.
What do you say, @funderburkjim ?
As there is already a headword brAhmaNasva instead of bAhmaNasva, I have a question. Is it because Nachtrage p. 392 correction? Or an independent fix? But what about sumna [L=127297] p. 386 in Nachtrage = lies n. st. m., but it's still "— 2) m. ". Or is MW the only one with Nachtrage incorporated since 2012? kairaNika - one more proof that MW is not the only one. But at the same time there is gavinI instead of gavInI as per PW7, p. 341.