sanskrit-lexicon / PWK

Sanskrit-Wörterbuch in kürzerer Fassung, 7 Bände Petersburg 1879-1889
3 stars 1 forks source link

Nachtrage Implementation #5

Open gasyoun opened 9 years ago

gasyoun commented 9 years ago

As there is already a headword brAhmaNasva instead of bAhmaNasva, I have a question. Is it because Nachtrage p. 392 correction? Or an independent fix? But what about sumna [L=127297] p. 386 in Nachtrage = lies n. st. m., but it's still "— 2) m. ". Or is MW the only one with Nachtrage incorporated since 2012? kairaNika - one more proof that MW is not the only one. But at the same time there is gavinI instead of gavInI as per PW7, p. 341.

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

Could you provide more details about which words appear (or not) in which dictionaries? I do not understand the question.

gasyoun commented 8 years ago

I meant PWK (= http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/PWScan/2014/web/webtc/indexcaller.php). I have explored a few cases. For example: sumna [L=127300] has — 2) m., but as per Nachträge (=Additions) it should have been — 2) n. (lies n. st. m.). Nachträge are included at end of a volume or as the 7th volume of PWK.

maltenth commented 8 years ago

All corrections in pwk have been incorporated in SCH(midt). These should be linked to the original.

gasyoun commented 8 years ago

@thomasincambodia Why thank you, indeed, how could I forget. I checked http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/SCHScan/2014/web/webtc/indexcaller.php and got " sumná [L=26758] [p= 367-2] 2. lies n. statt m. 1" - that means if we would have a list of overlapping words in PWK and SCH - that would be a list of additions that needed to be made. But what about headwords, that have been fixed? How to detect them programmatically, to implement them in PWK?

Andhrabharati commented 3 weeks ago

Now that all the VN pages of pwk volumes got digitized (courtesy Jim & Thomas), various issues on pwkvn and SCH could be closed now.

What do you say, @funderburkjim ?