Closed funderburkjim closed 3 months ago
Similar in https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/PWK/blob/master/pw_ls/pwbib/pwbib_new_work/mergebibnew.txt, just was thinking about the same. Like ZIMMER,ALTIND.LEBEN:ZIMMER,Altind.Leben:546:0:?
My vague memory says that whenever there are two consecutive references from one literary source, the dictionary doesn't write the literary source again. It only writes stanza number. So if we join the Literary sources just preceding these pure number entries, most of them would be correct.
@funderburkjim
I presume this issue is now closable.
An examination of purenumberabbrvlist.txt shows that there are several (up to 161) items which are present in the file due to digitization errors.
Of these, 89 are matchable to already known literary source abbreviations if they are capitalized, for example: