search

sanskrit-lexicon / PWK

Sanskrit-Wörterbuch in kürzerer Fassung, 7 Bände Petersburg 1879-1889
3 stars 1 forks source link

PW(K) corrections-1: Andhrabharati #72

Closed Andhrabharati closed 1 year ago

Andhrabharati commented 3 years ago

[As I have never left a work (to the planned level) unfinished, this is just an indication that my PWG session is over; was thinking of proofing the HWs portions as some errors were noticed during my work. May be sometime very soon.]

It is but natural that one would see PWK after PWG (when seriously interested).

I have the PWK text converted into Devanagari, and the very first corrections list is being posted here.

PW(K) corrections-1

[This is with a check for "small letter followed by Cap. letter". Similar correction was done in PWG in my working.]

funderburkjim commented 3 years ago

@Andhrabharati Will get to this eventually.

gasyoun commented 3 years ago

was thinking of proofing the HWs portions

@Andhrabharati please, please, please.

drdhaval2785 commented 3 years ago

Any update @Andhrabharati ?

Andhrabharati commented 3 years ago

Any update @Andhrabharati ?

???

Andhrabharati commented 3 years ago

Just posting AB version of the (basic) corrected pw file, for the perusal of others. pw_AB_L0.zip

[Except for saying that the quality of digitisation is quite poor as compared with other files seen here so far, I do not want to go further with any comments/observations (too many encountered; and only a very few handled), lest it would hurt the feelings of others.]

funderburkjim commented 3 years ago

metaline comparisons:

gasyoun commented 3 years ago

Otherwise, the metalines are identical in pw.txt and pw_AB_L0.txt.

Oh, so most changes seem to be inside.

funderburkjim commented 3 years ago

Made the corrections to pw.txt posted in first comment above. See commit 66fa46b.

One slight adjustment made : 367928 <ls>SUŚR.1,368,18</ls> fügen.

Also a few changes of 'eine best ' to 'eine best. ' 'best.' found to be a German abbreviation for 'bestimmte' = 'a certain (kind of)'. translation provided by Thomas.

Andhrabharati commented 3 years ago 
* Suggest change in L=33744 in pw_AB_L0.txt  KAditaMr -> KAditar  (M not needed) and similarly remove anusvAra in body:

I've noticed too many typos, and was thinking of correcting atleast the front portion (HW entry and the continuation) next.

Had just spent 3 days for arriving at the above basic version.

The ultimate goal is to bring this pw also to the format of my PWG (did about 90% of rearrangement and stalled).

Here are some sample screens of this PWG- image

image

image

image

image

Ultimately vLex and Lex fields would be combined; and the entry & contd. fields would be with the grouped HWs to be appropriately split as separate entries as done in MW.

maltenth commented 3 years ago

Just posting AB version of the (basic) corrected pw file, for the perusal of others. pw_AB_L0.zip

[Except for saying that the quality of digitisation is quite poor as compared with other files seen here so far, I do not want to go further with any comments/observations (too many encountered; and only a very few handled), lest it would hurt the feelings of others.]

@Andhrabharati Your restraint is appreciated and even more so if you were also not to allude to (potentially hurtful) comments you have suppressed.

gasyoun commented 3 years ago

Had just spent 3 days for arriving at the above basic version.

Hard working you are.

funderburkjim commented 3 years ago

Slight different format for ls 'chapter, verse'

Have been working to harvest corrections to 'ls' tags from pw_AB_L0. An example is <116,17.> <ls>Spr.</ls> <2121. 7756.> Here the 'ls' tag indicates the name of the literary source. and the specifics of the reference are put in a 'naked' <> markup. Usually this 'naked' tag starts with a digit, as in the examples above. But occasionally the 'naked' tag starts with some other character, as in <ls>HANUM. UP.</ls> <S. 392.>, where the 'S.' is abbreviation for 'Seite' = 'Page'.

It is somewhat difficult to devise logic to distinguish such a non-numeric tag from some unrelated xml markup such as <bot>, <ab>, etc.

Thus, in future work suggest some more easily identifiable markup. Some suggestions <ln>116,17.</ln>, <_116,17.>

Andhrabharati commented 3 years ago

It is somewhat difficult to devise logic to distinguish such a non-numeric tag from some unrelated xml markup

When a novice like me could "frame" a logic, wonder why such an expert as @funderburkjim cannot "devise" one!

maltenth commented 3 years ago

It is somewhat difficult to devise logic to distinguish such a non-numeric tag from some unrelated xml markup

When a novice like me could "frame" a logic, wonder why such an expert as @funderburkjim cannot "devise" one!

@Andhrabharati Jim (being a Ph.D. in mathematics) might have referred to mathematical logic (and not "a" logic), for all I know, so just presenting your solution would be sufficient.
A sarcastic reference to a senior colleague, as "such an expert as", is rude.

gasyoun commented 3 years ago

@Andhrabharati we can do more together, than on our own. Be softer, thanks.

Andhrabharati commented 3 years ago

@Andhrabharati ... so just presenting your solution would be sufficient.

Sorry to be back on this, @thomasincambodia!

I was just responding to the below suggestion by @funderburkjim -

Thus, in future work suggest some more easily identifiable markup.

And I guess, he has understood me well enough over the past few monhts, to "filter" my comments to get only what he needs out of my posts.

Andhrabharati commented 1 year ago

I think, this issue is closeable now.