Closed funderburkjim closed 1 year ago
Dear Jim, I have to make a break for a week. Tomorrow we are going to Athens to visit some exhibitions and to place orders for new tourist season. If everything be fine I am coming back home on next Wednesday.
test7.py doesn't run because the parameter of the repl function is treated as Match object, not a string.
test8.py provides one way to rewrite the repl function. It is run with both test1.txt and test8a.txt as example files. See readme.txt for usage details
change_test2.py modifies change_test1.py, using the ideas of test8 (i.e., use of repl function to
modify text fragments {%..%}
).
The result file, for debugging purposes,
[[...]]
@AnnaRybakovaT When you're back, after studying the above, then
When you're back, after studying the above, then
Dear Jim, I am at home. On Monday I will be able to do all mentioned above steps.
run change_test3
* Examine all the changes -- I expect about 235 lines changed. * If there are drastically more changes, don't examine all of them! * Note any changes that are wrong
Dear Jim, Please check the change_test3.py
change_test3.txt (223 changes in 184 entries)
After examination of all changes I didn't find any wrong cases.
As you will notice I did some changes in the file test8.py - it is about only to one typo in two comments.
change_test3.txt looks good. Only 2.5 things remain:
Let's call the 'final' change program change_1.py. Start with a copy of change_test3.py
cp change_test3.py change_1.py
Manually edit change_1.py
[[...]]
in inserted -- these were just for debugging.Per usage directions in readme.txt
I happened to notice that your version of temp_pw_0.txt is not the latest.
git pull
to get the latest.issue91/temp_pw_0.txt
with the revised csl-orig/v02/pw/pw.txtI think change_1.txt should complete preparation of the change file for our issue91. Then push.
Then push.
That is, add and push the pwk repository
I happened to notice that your version of temp_pw_0.txt is not the latest.
Dear Jim, I have updated the repository csl-orig and I see that pw.txt hase a date 12.01.2021 (is it the latest version?)
Rybakova@ST-Rybakova MINGW64 ~/Documents/cologne/csl-orig (master)
$ git pull
Already up to date.
Anna - Do a 'git log' in csl-orig. The top (most recent) commit should show:
commit 1f1daf94f18e008af3a9ea8f892df6e9fd2734f7 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: funderburkjim <funderburkjim@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:53:16 2023 -0500
PWG: numeric orphans, 5
Ref: https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/PWG/issues/65
Do a 'git log' in csl-orig
I have:
Rybakova@ST-Rybakova MINGW64 ~/Documents/cologne/csl-orig (master)
$ git log
commit ae8dc65fa97abd1f3d7e89309ad1d288704a5160 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: AnnaRybakovaT <arybakovatheohari@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Mar 6 15:38:43 2021 +0400
pe.txt - Batch 3
commit 0ebb8d7f523c0b9038b389cd5421b4c44135e4f2
Merge: 6b45d9d e1e11ad
Author: AnnaRybakovaT <74726889+AnnaRybakovaT@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat Mar 6 14:34:05 2021 +0300
Merge pull request #6 from sanskrit-lexicon/master
06.02.2021
commit e1e11ad00eddc9e0ee20ac98c5f0c706959ccac0
Author: funderburkjim <funderburkjim@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Mar 4 18:02:05 2021 -0500
mw: Minor correction at L=37689, 43347
commit 47c60b13702e63699e80d7c477650a4fc9529cbe
Author: funderburkjim <funderburkjim@gmail.com>
Your 'csl-orig' is definitely not in sync. I'm not sure where it comes from. We can investigate that later.
For now, get the latest csl-orig from github.
Now,
As check, cd ~/Documents/cologne/csl-orig and do 'git log' again.
* yours should agree with mine
Now it is the same
Rybakova@ST-Rybakova MINGW64 ~/Documents/cologne/csl-orig (master)
$ git log
commit 1f1daf94f18e008af3a9ea8f892df6e9fd2734f7 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: funderburkjim <funderburkjim@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:53:16 2023 -0500
PWG: numeric orphans, 5
Ref: https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/PWG/issues/65
@AnnaRybakovaT The changes of change_1.txt now look fine. They have been installed. (see readme.txt section after change_1.txt for details.)
OUR WORK IS FINISHED for this issue :)
Investigate: where did csl-orig-anna come from?
- The output may provide a clue
Dear Jim, please, see the output:
Rybakova@ST-Rybakova MINGW64 ~/Documents/cologne/csl-orig-anna (master)
$ git remote -v
origin https://github.com/AnnaRybakovaT/csl-orig.git (fetch)
origin https://github.com/AnnaRybakovaT/csl-orig.git (push)
@AnnaRybakovaT Not sure if the csl-orig at your github account has further use. Perhaps it was made as part of a workflow with @drdhaval2785.
It is Anna’s fork of csl-orig repository.
Anna can delete this repository without any information loss. Forked repositories are useful if we want to create pull requests.
Anna can delete this repository without any information loss.
Thanks!
Solve the problem mentioned in https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/csl-orig/issues/1033.