Closed funderburkjim closed 1 year ago
In two cases, the CDSL digitization represents as two entries. The first example, with correction.
OLD:
<L>54327<pc>3140-1<k1>dvyAsya<k2>(dvyAsya)<e>000
{#(dvyAsya)#}¦
<LEND>
<L>54328<pc>3140-1<k1>dviAsya<k2>dvi/Asya<e>107
{#dvi/Asya#}¦ , {#dvi/AsiAsiA#} <lex>Adj.</lex> (<lex>f.</lex> {#A#}) {%zweimäulig%} <ls>AV. 5,19,10. 8,6,22.</ls>
<LEND>
Correction. L=54327 deleted and 54328 changed
NEW:
<L>54328<pc>3140-1<k1>dvyAsya<k2>(dvyAsya)<e>107
{#(dvyAsya)#}¦ {#dvi/Asya#} , {#dvi/Asia#} <lex>Adj.</lex> (<lex>f.</lex> {#A#}) {%zweimäulig%} <ls>AV. 5,19,10. 8,6,22.</ls>
<LEND>
Second example similar.
OLD:
<L>65301<pc>4059-3<k1>pastyasad<k2>(pastyasad)<e>000
{#(pastyasad)#}¦
<LEND>
<L>65302<pc>4059-3<k1>pastiasad<k2>pastiasad<e>100
{#pastiasad#}¦ <lex>m.</lex> {%Hausgenosse.%}
<LEND>
Correction: delete L=65301 and change 65302
NEW:
<L>65302<pc>4059-3<k1>pastyasad<k2>(pastyasad)<e>000
{#(pastyasad)#}¦ {#pastiasa/d#} <lex>m.</lex> {%Hausgenosse.%}
<LEND>
In the work on https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/COLOGNE/issues/407, two anomalies were found among 'parenthetical headwords'
A typical example is: