Closed drdhaval2785 closed 2 years ago
I am not sure whether the transcoder code renders jihvAmUlIya properly or not. If not, @funderburkjim may have to write a few lines of code to accomodate it.
Correction made in csl-orig. transcoding portion pending for Jim.
I am not sure whether the transcoder code renders jihvAmUlIya properly or not. If not, @funderburkjim may have to write a few lines of code to accomodate it.
This is what Jim gave under PWG #5 (to be from slp1_deva.xml, which is used for rendering purpose),
< Z = jihvamuliya = h with line below
< V = upadhmaniya = h with breve below
-->
<e> <s>INIT,SKT</s> <in>Z</in> <out>\u1cf2</out> <next>INIT</next></e>
<e> <s>INIT,SKT</s> <in>V</in> <out>\u1cf2</out> <next>INIT</next></e>
transcoding portion pending for Jim.
So apparently Jim is ready with the transcoding.
Unicode has thus- 1CF2 ᳲ VEDIC SIGN ARDHAVISARGA = vaidika jihvaamuuliiya upadhmaaniiya 1CF3 ᳳ VEDIC SIGN ROTATED ARDHAVISARGA
I would just like to say that quite many olden Skt. texts that I saw have this 1CF3 character for upadhmAnIya, not the iCF2 character.
However LIES (p. 202) gives the same 1CF2 character for both jihvamuliya & upadhmaniya, which is the base for Cologne's (Jim's) working.
Should V be changed to 1CF3?
I see it thus in some old Telugu and Kannada books!
And of course, some Devanagari books as well.
Similar https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.326738/page/n103/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/Siddhantakaumudi_English_Translation_SR_Ray/1.SiddhantakaumudiVol1Part1-Sandhi-SrRay1926/page/n165/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.496388/page/n229/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.424393/page/1613/mode/1up
Therefore, many old publications have them printed similarly. So, let us not change it as of now.
So probably it is marked the otherway more in South Indian editions, than in Northern India!!
let us not change it as of now.
Understood.
There is a case in YAT which is marked with ?? . The mark is known as jihvAmUlIya. page - https://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/csl-apidev/servepdf.php?dict=YAT&page=308-b
Digitization -
jihvAmUlIya is represented by 'Z' in SLP1 according to www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/talkMay2008/SLP1.pdf .
So made the following change.