Closed Andhrabharati closed 3 months ago
I was looking at MW feedback in 2023 (to update my revision file), and noticed the above.
Probable oversights made by me in processing 2023 user corrections.
Missed corrections need to be processed.
Not sure how to identify the ones needing attention.
One possible approach:
@funderburkjim
I did a redo of the exercise I did two days ago (in my file), now (in cdsl file) [using the cfr file].
Here are the three entries that got skipped-- [As I did not go the csl-orig issue way, I cannot give those numbers that you've asked.]
Also, it is seen that some of the entries reported by @aumsanskrit as hierarchy errors, that were marked as "Unable to reproduce" (or "Not able to reproduce"), are in fact quite valid.
The issue lies in the <e>
number of those entries which decides the List display [which I think Scott is using] ordering.
In most of the cases, it is <e>2
for <e>1
in the cdsl text.
BTW it seems it was Dhaval handling the user-corrections for these (in Jan '24), not Jim.
@Andhrabharati I think these have now been handled (and the above commit will also show the changes).
My notes: temp_hierarchy.txt
Good to note the same, @funderburkjim.
BTW, I see that the commit contains a correction--
<L>226089
is a <e>1
entry only, not <e>2
type.
Note the Devanagari text in this; and this also is a grouped HWs entry, having saṃ-varta & saṃ-var°taka as HWs. [In my (revision) working I had marked quite a huge number of such grouped entries; probably they would find place in the cdsl text sometime, as in GRA.]
<L>226089 is now <e>1
in cdsl.
Found the cfr file containing the user corrections submitted.
Though a good number of them have the "corrected" remark at the end of the submission, seen that some of those were not carried into the cdsl text files.