Some user corrections skipped entering the cdsl texts

[Andhrabharati]

Found the cfr file containing the user corrections submitted.

Though a good number of them have the "corrected" remark at the end of the submission, seen that some of those were not carried into the cdsl text files.

[Andhrabharati]

I was looking at MW feedback in 2023 (to update my revision file), and noticed the above.

[funderburkjim]

Probable oversights made by me in processing 2023 user corrections.
Missed corrections need to be processed. Not sure how to identify the ones needing attention. One possible approach:

• @Andhrabharati provides a list of csl-orig issue numbers that need attention.
• @funderburkjim to finish the installation of these corrections.

[Andhrabharati]

@funderburkjim

I did a redo of the exercise I did two days ago (in my file), now (in cdsl file) [using the cfr file].

Here are the three entries that got skipped-- [As I did not go the csl-orig issue way, I cannot give those numbers that you've asked.]

• 12/15/2023 21:15:58 MW ID=184900 vajra—danta boor boar Typo erik.seldeslachts@gmail.com:01-12-2024 corrected
• 12/19/2023 13:21:46 MW dadrūṇa dadrūṇa (also dara°). (also dard°). Typo srhodes@snowcrest.net:01-14-2024 corrected
• 12/19/2023 13:34:20 MW 89885.1 dadru (also dara° (also dard° Typo (I am fairly certain that this is a misprint based on the other variations listed below). srhodes@snowcrest.net:01-14-2024 corrected

Also, it is seen that some of the entries reported by @aumsanskrit as hierarchy errors, that were marked as "Unable to reproduce" (or "Not able to reproduce"), are in fact quite valid. The issue lies in the <e> number of those entries which decides the List display [which I think Scott is using] ordering. In most of the cases, it is <e>2 for <e>1 in the cdsl text.

[Andhrabharati]

BTW it seems it was Dhaval handling the user-corrections for these (in Jan '24), not Jim.

[funderburkjim]

@Andhrabharati I think these have now been handled (and the above commit will also show the changes).

My notes: temp_hierarchy.txt

[Andhrabharati]

Good to note the same, @funderburkjim.

BTW, I see that the commit contains a correction-- <L>226089 is a <e>1 entry only, not <e>2 type.

Note the Devanagari text in this; and this also is a grouped HWs entry, having saṃ-varta & saṃ-var°taka as HWs. [In my (revision) working I had marked quite a huge number of such grouped entries; probably they would find place in the cdsl text sometime, as in GRA.]

[funderburkjim]

<L>226089 is now <e>1 in cdsl.