Closed drdhaval2785 closed 3 years ago
yes it is ok to keep MWE in same manner as others.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 11:20 PM Dr. Dhaval Patel @.***> wrote:
Dear @neeleshb https://github.com/neeleshb All other dictionaries had two kind of dict object.
First connects the headword to a bunch of ids like "adrift": "313,31810"
The second connects the id to entry like
"313": "<BR>ADRIFT , adv. इतस्ततः प्लवमानः -ना -नं.", "31810": "<BR>ADRIFT , a. or adv. प्रवाहाधीनः -ना -नं, ओघाधीनः -ना -नं.",
Whereas in Monier Williams English-Sanskrit dictionary, there seems to be a combined entry like the following.
"adrift": [ "<BR>ADRIFT , adv. इतस्ततः प्लवमानः -ना -नं.", "<BR>ADRIFT , a. or adv. प्रवाहाधीनः -ना -नं, ओघाधीनः -ना -नं." ],
Is it OK if I keep MWE also in the same manner as the rest of the dictionaries are?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/csl-json/issues/3, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQS5NVZLIGZ42B6MYYRMGTT5CUZRANCNFSM5CHCB75A . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&utm_campaign=notification-email .
Dear @neeleshb All other dictionaries had two kind of dict object.
First connects the headword to a bunch of ids like
"adrift": "313,31810"
The second connects the id to entry like
Whereas in Monier Williams English-Sanskrit dictionary, there seems to be a combined entry like the following.
Is it OK if I keep MWE also in the same manner as the rest of the dictionaries are?