Closed Andhrabharati closed 1 year ago
BTW, I have revised the <ls>
marking in pwk as well, to have more "complete forms" for linking to the cited texts.
Now my pwk file version is 9 (pw_AB_09), updated over the ver. 8 done by Jim.
If @funderburkjim is convinced, (looking at the pwkvn data in my file above), about having these "complete" forms, I shall post my pw_AB_09 file also for his perusal.
These are obsolete now, as I have made both the files (pw and pwkvn) afresh again.
Thus closing the issue, as this did not attract @funderburkjim for an year now.
Just had a close look at the pwkvn_deva file, as converted by @funderburkjim.
It has "wrong" conversions for the
B. & R.
accent marks ('/' udAtta & '^' svarita), though they are proper in the online data (probably different transliteration files are used in the two processes).Had marked all the
<ls>
entries more "completely formed", and also the "orphan" numbers related to<ls>
items. Now, my file has more unique entries than the CDSL version (as at my versions of the PWG and pwk earlier; though Jim had considered my pwk file, he did not yet seem to have a chance to see my PWG data).Probably Jim might find this useful to update in his file, so posting my file here for his perusal-- pwkvn (AB).txt [Note. I had removed the
<althws> lines
throughout.]