Get rid of AWT dependencies (use cases not covered)

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Referring to 179 issue some use case are not covered.
For example to know if to polygons instersects we check only if one or more 
edges of the two polygon are inside the other polygon shape. This works for our 
uses cases (check if a door is inside a room) but if we have two polygons like 
this (a "plus sign" shape)

            _______
_______|______|_______
|           |           |            |
|_____ _|______|_ _____|
            |           |
            ------------
it will return false even if they "intersects" each other (because no edges are 
contained)

How much you feel this feature will be useful for the project?

[ ] Optional
[X] Usefull
[ ] Can make the difference
[ ] Necessary

Original issue reported on code.google.com by virtualc...@gmail.com on 21 Oct 2012 at 3:44

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I don't really think this is a problem.
This use case is not present in our "zones" topology, so we don't need to 
implement it.

Original comment by gabriel....@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2012 at 6:55

[GoogleCodeExporter]

we can close this issue adding the missing use cases into javadoc of 
intersects(). Please mark as verified when the javadoc is updated

Original comment by enrico.n...@gmail.com on 22 Oct 2012 at 8:48

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by enrico.n...@gmail.com on 28 Oct 2012 at 6:21

• Changed state: Verified

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by gabriel....@gmail.com on 29 Oct 2012 at 6:56

• Added labels: Milestone-Release5.4
• Removed labels: Milestone-Release5.5

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by virtualc...@gmail.com on 26 Feb 2013 at 10:26

• Added labels: Component-Framework