Closed b2d3c closed 3 weeks ago
There seem to be two record parts where something is off. One of which is http://data.performing-arts.ch/r/7de23c2b-9754-40de-9001-362c6682047f. I'm investigating
The issue is not with the processing date but with the generic date. There are two record parts that have a date entity but where that entity lacks a type. The switch form requires the entities to have a type.
The record parts in question are:
PREFIX spao: <http://ontology.performing-arts.ch/>
PREFIX rico: <https://www.ica.org/standards/RiC/ontology#>
SELECT * WHERE {
BIND(<http://data.performing-arts.ch/r/8e34ed6a-559a-4813-8819-21339e08640b> as ?record)
?recordPart rico:isOrWasConstituentOf ?record .
?recordPart rico:isAssociatedWithDate ?value .
OPTIONAL {
?value a ?type .
}
}
There are some more record parts where this issue appears. You can find them with this query:
PREFIX spao: <http://ontology.performing-arts.ch/>
PREFIX rico: <https://www.ica.org/standards/RiC/ontology#>
SELECT * WHERE {
?record a rico:Record .
?recordPart rico:isOrWasConstituentOf ?record .
?recordPart rico:isAssociatedWithDate ?value .
FILTER NOT EXISTS {
?value a ?type .
}
}
Note that it is visible in the form where the date fields are not loading:
Thanks Florian.
Could you add the date type in this Parts and also in the others with the same Issue you have fund?
Thanks in advance
Query:
PREFIX spao: <http://ontology.performing-arts.ch/>
PREFIX rico: <https://www.ica.org/standards/RiC/ontology#>
INSERT {
GRAPH ?g {
?value a <https://www.ica.org/standards/RiC/ontology#SingleDate>
}
} WHERE {
?record a rico:Record .
?recordPart rico:isOrWasConstituentOf ?record .
GRAPH ?g {
?recordPart rico:isAssociatedWithDate ?value .
}
FILTER NOT EXISTS {
?value a ?type .
}
}
Done
Thanks !
In http://data.performing-arts.ch/r/8e34ed6a-559a-4813-8819-21339e08640b
we can't save modification because of a date bug.
We have already try to delete double Date but the warning is still remaining.
Could you see where it's come from?
Thanks in adance!