Add inter rater tools

[DOH-TJB0303]

Add tool that will support inter-rater/consensus manual review of a sample of pulled records.

[DOH-TJB0303]

Additional Checklist of Updates:

• [x] Adjust EXCEL Template to just say manually review definitions TRUE/FALSE (instead of specifying the definitions).
• [x] Rename Manual_Review to Validation_Review
• [x] Within each Output Folder nested a: 1) Matched_Elements, and Validation_Review subfolder.
• [x] Remove 0_Raw_Data subfolder under Validation_Review (just use the files from Output).
• [x] Add All_(Def1) and All_(Def2) data sets to Output to replace 0_Raw_Data
• [x] Test ReviewScale variables to ensure they are robust against weird user input scale (such as 1-7).

[DOH-TJB0303]

We are factoring Review Category Labels (True Positive, False Positive) before feeding the reviewer data to caret::confusionMatrix(). Under this format, "Uncertain" Review Category labels are set to NA within the factor, and I believed dropped from the query metric calculations.

@DOH-SNC1303 @DOH-SNC1303

Question: Is there a way to incorporate "Uncertain' review labels into Query performance metrics? I have really only seen 2x2 (TP/FP and TN/FN) so dropping "Uncertain" review categories seems like an ok approach...

[DOH-TJB0303]

Considerations for additional SRS variables:

• [ ] Sex
• [ ] Race
• [ ] Ethnicity
• [ ] NCHS Urban-Rural Classification (Patient or Facility Region)
• [ ] Severity of Visit
• [ ] AgeGroup --> not sure how we would want to do this --> ranges of complexity here...

[DOH-TJB0303]

12/14/2023:

Added # Create Matched Elements Subfolder fs::dir_create(paste0(output_folder, "Matched_Elements"))

to support Matched_Elements subfolder creation (where data is written)