Week 7 Grading

[crystalwidjaja]

• [x] Front End
• [x] Control Improvements
• [x] Model Improvements
• [ ] Deployment
  • Group Video

[jm1021]

Discussed readme issues and has checkboxes here for grading. Good ticket with lii. Ticket for Risa was everthing she is working on. Sarah is creating several models.

Ava is incorporating into mini lab into PBL.

[jm1021]

.9/1

[Dhrruvb1]

Overall, Good Job. All the tasks were completed well, and it is clear that you guys split up the work and finished it all. The work was easy to navigate, and easy to follow. Scrum board is organized and it is easy to understand. No obvious weaknesses, or things that need work except lack of data samples.
Ava grading - 7.75/8. All individual work is complete, team contribution is obvious. It says there is only one commit in October on her profile, but when you loot at commit history, it is obvious that she has a good amount of commits. There are no data samples however. (-.25 off for the entire group because of no data samples)

[ChristopherDuroiu]

Risa grading - Great job. All of your individual work and assigned tasks are complete, including college board notes, and tpt notes, and corrections. Division of group work could be a little more clear, and your individual tasks could be a little more concise - it is a little bit difficult to understand your role when there are so many small tasks (you should have a more generalized role and sub tasks under). I still found most things in your commits. Video is useful and website is working well, however your group doesn't have any data samples, so your front end code for that task is missing. 4.75 for group grade and 3/3 for individual

[KaavyaU]

Team Grading

View - 1/1 --> Grayscale button worked well, Integrated project into their theme, Also recolored images Control - 1/1 --> Website demonstrated to work well without errors, meaning control is also completed well Model - 2.75/3 --> High-level code; Toggle button for the watermark, no errors; No data samples were shown, however

Video - Well put together and made it really easy to find everything README and Scrum Board Review - Organized, so that every person's code was separated (made it easy to find everything) Pull Code - Commits from every person (though it didn't show up under their profile); work divided up and completed evenly

Overall:

• Well implemented into existing theme, code without errors, and equal contribution from every person
• Improve On: Organization of the Scrum Board could have been slightly improved (but that's just being very picky)
• Total Points: 5/5 points

[JacquelineC23]

Sarah- 7.75/8 3/3 for individual work; completed all individual work, well organized journal with all things needed, able to see contribution through commits 4.75/5 for group work; great job but still have problem with showing data samples

[KaavyaU]

Crystal Individual Work

• Equal distribution of work was clear (Crystal did mostly control improvements) - Control didn't seem to change much from example code (based on what is seen in the commits at least), though all the code works correctly. Maybe in the future, try to add more to the control to make it more advanced ; Profile shows many commits - 1.5/1.5
• In depth notes (covered all college board videos and recorded most important information), no quiz corrections needed, Journals are organized and in depth - 1.5/1.5

Individual Total: 3/3 points

[KaavyaU]

Total Scores

• Ava - 7.50/8
• Risa - 7.75/8
• Sarah - 7.75/8
• Crystal - 7.75/8

[jm1021]

I am very impressed with your graders. They said some of the things I thought, specifically "a lot of little things". For some reason, Ava style resonates with me when she shares and talks about code. I am honestly a little confused when I hear others talk.

I did notice on Risa's talk that your HTML looks pretty repetitive. I would like to see that be the focus of your database is to drive that page (not so much login stuff).

BTW, I really like halloween and winter mode touches!!! Grades as indicated by your graders.