search

sarjinius / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Inconsistency in the description of book command in UG #11

Open sarjinius opened 2 months ago

sarjinius commented 2 months ago

Image 4-19-24 at 5.17 PM.jpg

Image 4-19-24 at 5.18 PM.jpg

The top has -note, the bottom does not.

nus-se-bot commented 2 months ago

Team's Response

No details provided by team.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Example provided in the UG does not work

I attempted to add a new consultation into the application using the step 4 example of section Let's add some sample data. However, I am running into an error. Please refer to the images below.

image.png

image.png

[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#665] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Accepted - forgot to include -note as a neccessary parameter in UG

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`] Originally [`severity.Low`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]