Closed FedeGueli closed 6 months ago
Branch 5 is 5 now, plus 1 recomb with XBB* that cause it to lose C1762A
Thank you @aviczhl2
issue #987 got S:T572I
Branch 5 went to 10 (ping @corneliusroemer ) branch 3 went to 4
Oh, the recomb of branch 5 and XBB goes to 2.
Oh, the recomb of branch 5 and XBB goes to 2.
Propose it in a separate issue
Branch 5 +3 Sweden, 13 now
ping @corneliusroemer i suggest direct designation of branch 5.
thx @aviczhl2
Branch 5 is 24 now.
1->5->24 in the last 2 weeks.
Branch 5 is 24 now.
1->5->24 in the last 2 weeks.
@corneliusroemer please designate it(branch 5) clearly up quickly
thx @Memorablea Branch 5 now designated JN.1.1.1 via https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/commit/10d1bb4c6e5a1cce9197d57112529617b412b2aa
branch 1: +1 Branch 2 : +2
Branch +1 >> 4 Branch +4 >> 8
ping @corneliusroemer also Branch 3 seems quite fast.
Branch 3 at 10 (+2)
Branch 4 : +1 Switzerland
branch 2 went to 4 all french samles. Note that 3 out of 4 have S:N657D
Added branch 7 mini saltation with 49Y,572I,1259Y
Added branch 8 from Austria from orf1a:T170I branch with 3
Branch 1 to 5 Branch 3 to 12
There is this mini thing https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice47_genome_fe89_2b830.json?f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample>=S.572I
Search:C23277T, C29762T,A23531G three of them in France.
Branch 1 > +2 Netherlands Branch 4 > +1 Belgium (three countries) Branch 6 > +1
There is this mini thing https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice47_genome_fe89_2b830.json?f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample>=S.572I Search:C23277T, C29762T,A23531G three of them in France.
Thx it is branch 2
Branch 1 > +1 Branch 3 > +5 Branch 8 > +1
@corneliusroemer branch 3 worth getting designated.
Added branch 9 from Austria 2 seqs Added branch 10 from Italy 2 seqs
Branch 2 +11 all having S:E657D
B1 > 18 B2 > 15 B3> 32
@corneliusroemer Branch 1 Branch 2 and Branch 3 all worth a designation in my view . If you want to act prudentially start with Branch 3.
B1> 29 B3> 45 B9 > 4
@corneliusroemer :i ve just proposed Branch 1 in https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/2428
and
Branch 3 in https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/2429
Added Branch 11 Scotland (4 seqs)
B2 > 16 B7 > 3 B9 > 6
Branch 12 added with 3 sequences Uk/Den
Branch 13 added JN.1.2 from Canada w 3 seqs
Added Branch 14 from Uk 13 sequences, recent lineage.
Added Branch 15 from #1244
Added Branch 16 and 17 Orf1a:T170I new branches from Branch 18 to 20 Uploaded branch 21 22 23(mini saltation)
added branch 24 25 26
added branch 27 that is a sublineage of https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/2410
Added branch 28 mini saltation from Denmark
Branch 3 designated JN.1.8.1 via https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/commit/ede4d8fb6fbb5666ede586808e3783294eb675ea
Branch 1 designated JN.1.7 via https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/commit/d86f724c7fb8b16b42cd91033e7cb64ac1563883
A few parents up from branch 7 there is also 1259y 572s in canada, 4 seqs. Don't know if this issue is fit for also tracking other 572 mutations or if it should go somewhere seperately? It seems to me that S2 mutations and the mutations at 572 occur together
A few parents up from branch 7 there is also 1259y 572s in canada, 4 seqs. Don't know if this issue is fit for also tracking other 572 mutations or if it should go somewhere seperately? It seems to me that S2 mutations and the mutations at 572 occur together
Thank you! i noticed S:T572S weeks ago too but lost track of it then, please propose it separately
@corneliusroemer updated as today i ve flagged growing or slow branches to simplify our work
Branch 14 proposed in # 2461 of Pango repo
Branch 1 (JN.1.7) has a cluster of 7 s:q613h in washington, USA (identical nucleotides). Haven't seen q613h much in ba.2.86 but since branch 1 is relatively quick it's good to monitor, if sequences pop up elsewhere. If they do I will make an issue, for now I think this comment will suffice. Of course q613h was slightly advantageous in first half 2023, but lost its advantage in latter half so it might not do much
Branch 1 (JN.1.7) has a cluster of 7 s:q613h in washington, USA (identical nucleotides). Haven't seen q613h much in ba.2.86 but since branch 1 is relatively quick it's good to monitor, if sequences pop up elsewhere. If they do I will make an issue, for now I think this comment will suffice. Of course q613h was slightly advantageous in first half 2023, but lost its advantage in latter half so it might not do much
i would propose it in this repo if i was me
Branch 1 (JN.1.7) has a cluster of 7 s:q613h in washington, USA (identical nucleotides). Haven't seen q613h much in ba.2.86 but since branch 1 is relatively quick it's good to monitor, if sequences pop up elsewhere. If they do I will make an issue, for now I think this comment will suffice. Of course q613h was slightly advantageous in first half 2023, but lost its advantage in latter half so it might not do much
i would propose it in this repo if i was me
Alright, I will make an issue then
Added branch 29
Branch 1 > Now designated JN.1.7
Branch 2 > France Count:76 Slow JN.1 > T26511C > S:T572I (C23277T) Note that 3 out of 4 have also S:N657D Query: A7842G, T26511C,C23277T
Branch 3 > designated JN.1.8.1
Branch 4 dead
Branch 5 >Count 358 designated JN.1.1.1
Branch 6 > Count 25 Canada sublineage of JN.1.2 / DUPLICATE of Branch 13 keeping the other open
Branch 7 Dead
Branch 8 > designated JN.1.4.3
Branch 9 > dead
Branch 10 > Dead
Branch 11 Dead
Branch 12 Dead
Branch 13 Slow
Branch 14 proposed in https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/2461
Branch 15 > Designated KW.1
Branch 16 > Dead
Branch 17 count 53 (always check) France, England, South Australia Defining JN.1.1 > C11747T > S:T572I (C23277T) Query: C1762A,C23277T,C11747T,-C9142T,-C280T,-C5314T,-C4093T,-A4912G,-C1218T,-G1820A,-A6588G,-C16650T, Now it got a branch with S:R346T Query: C11747T ,C23277T ,G22599C ,T3565C (19)
Branch 18 > Designated KV.2
Branch 19 designated JN.1.4.6
Branch 20 now proposed in https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/2512
Branch 21 count 5 Denmark Dead
Branch 22 > count 8 USA Nevada dead
Branch 23 Dead
Branch 24 > Dead
Branch 25 > Dead
Branch 26 > Designated JN.1.47.2
Branch 27 > Designated JN.1.9.1
Branch 28 Dead
Branch 29 Dead
Branch 30 Dead
Branch 31 > dead
Branch 32 now it is under JN.1.4.3
Branch 33 Dead
Branch 34 > Count 5 Germany Us UK dead
Branch 35 Dead
Branch 36 dead
Branch 37 > 22 US
JN.1.4.5 ( T18453C+Orf8:S103L=C28201T)> C11653T > S:T572I ( C23277T) Query: C28201T, C11653T , C23277T
Branch 38 Dead
Branch 39 > count: 13 (US)
JN.1 > G17562T, C27563T > C27595T > Orf1a:S2242F (C6990T) > S:T572I (C23277T) Query: C6990T,C27595T, C23277T
Branch 40 dead
Branch 41 Dead
Branch 42
Branch 43: > 4 US Dead
Branch 44 DEAD
Branch 45 now proposed in https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/2540
Branch 46 Dead
Branch 47 > 19 (Can,Us) JN.1 > A18093G > S:T572I (C23277T) Query: A18093G ,C23277T,T3565C
Branch 48 dead
Branch 49 > 20 Chile ( Spotted by @aviczhl2 ) JN.1.21 (S:H1058Y) > Orf1b:K2358R (A20540G) > S:T572I (C23277T) Query: A20540G,C23277T
Branch 50 Dead
Branch 51 > 28 South Korea JN.1.1> > C11747T > T16461C > A4912G > S:T572I (C23277T) Query: C11747T , T16461C , A4912G ,C23277T
Branch 52 Dead
Branch 53 > 9 Wales Slow JN.1 > Orf1a:I2903M (A8974G )> Orf1a:W630C (G2155T) > Orf1b:H2010Y (C19495T), S:T572I (C23277T) Query: G2155T,C19495T,C23277T
Branch 54 > 34 US JN.1>C1060T > C9166T > Orf1a:T2166N (C6762A) > S:T572I (C23277T) Query: C9166T ,C6762A,C23277T,T3565C
Branch 55 > 22 Austria,Spain JN.1> Orf3a:D199H (G25987C) > S:T572I (C23277T)> T14179C,C25710T Orf3a:D199H reverted then Query: T14179C,C25710T
Branch 56 > 13 Hubei JN.1 > Orf1a:G400S (G1463A) > C3817T > A19314G > A29538G > Orf1a:P959S (C3140T), S:T572I (C23277T) Query: A19314G ,C3140T,C3817T
Branch 57 Dead
Branch 58 Australia spotted and proposed by @aviczhl2 in https://github.com/sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals/issues/1473
Branch 59 Designated KP.1.2 spotted by @aviczhl2 KP.1 >C5884T, T10636G, S:T572I (C23277T), G24193C, C29218T Query: A24819G,C23277T,T3565C new query ( old query: C5884T, T10636G) Samples: 4 US There is another sample clustering with this without the silent mutations but with S:S:680P and S:K1245R
Branch 60 found using @aviczhl2 's tool #1484 JN.1.4> > T18453C > Orf1a:K4348K (A13308G)> Orf1b:P1223T (C17134A) > S:T572I ( C23277T) Query: C17134A,C23277T,A13308G Samples : 6 (South Korea)
Branch 61 dead
Branch 62 combo dead
Branch 63 Designated KP.5 Now proposed in https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/2568
Now TRIO Branch: JN.1.11.1 >S:T572I (C23277T) > C3811T > C2197T, C9857T, S:R346T (G22599C) ,A23080G Query:C3811T , C2197T, C9857T,T3565C Samples: 4 (US)
Branch 64 Dead
Branch 65 Dead
Branch 66 found by @aviczhl2 in #1513 JN.1 > Orf1a:K4483R (A13712G) > Orf1a:A2529S (G7850T) > Orf1a:D1513E (T4804G) >S:T572I (C23277T) Orf3a:S92L (C25667T), T26047C, C28115T Query: C25667T, T26047C, C28115T Samples : 35 Australia
Branch 67 dead
Branch 68 proposed by @aviczhl2 in https://github.com/sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals/issues/1501
Branch 69: spotted and proposed by @aviczhl2 in #1518
branch 70: dead
Branch 71 : proposed in https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/2564
Branch 72: spotted by @aviczhl2 and proposed in https://github.com/sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals/issues/1522
Branch 73 spotted and proposed by @aviczhl2 in https://github.com/sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals/issues/1518
Branch 74 spotted by @DoropFan JN.1>T18471C>C7732T>C20436T>C23277T Query: C7732T, C20436T, C23277T,T3565C Samples: 15
Singlets: 1) Fujan query: C6385T, A16339G, C28313T 2) Moved to Br.70
Query for all JN.1 + 572I = C18894T, T15756A, -C6541T,C23277T > 5209