Closed aviczhl2 closed 3 months ago
Very strange, but there's a very similar recombinant sequence from Utah, USA, but the breakpoints are not exactly the same. It may actually be unrelated. If so, this would represent an incredible example of convergent recombination. Or perhaps the person in which the recombination happened may have infected different people with slightly different versions of this recombinant? EPI_ISL_18975795 https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_39d6b_1801a0.json?c=gt-nuc_14118&gmax=15118&gmin=13118&label=id:node_11338312
Very strange, but there's a very similar recombinant sequence from Utah, USA, but the breakpoints are not exactly the same. It may actually be unrelated. If so, this would represent an incredible example of convergent recombination. Or perhaps the person in which the recombination happened may have infected different people with slightly different versions of this recombinant? EPI_ISL_18975795 https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_39d6b_1801a0.json?c=gt-nuc_14118&gmax=15118&gmin=13118&label=id:node_11338312
They shall be the same recombinants. Usher edits seqs and fixes some JN.1 mutations to seqs to prevent artefacts, however this brings recombinants on the tree JN.1 mutations that they shouldn't have, hence new uploaded seqs for the recombinant will have additional "reversions." because they don't have those JN.1 mutations.
@AngieHinrichs This seems to be a terrible feature of usher for recombinant lineages.
@ryhisner I checked and the Utah seq has the same breakpoints as the other 3.
A2443G is also inherited from a JN.3.2.1 branch. And as 3431 is reverted, the breakpoint should be upstream of it.
https://github.com/sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals/issues/991#issuecomment-1979643252 (1513 and 11417 are not in the Utah sequence)
One more from California today, collected 2024-3-3. EPI_ISL_19015176
One more from California today, collected 2024-3-3. EPI_ISL_19015176
Ryan i cna't find a query to catch it too, have u a suggestion?
No mutation bug again.
One more from California today, collected 2024-3-3. EPI_ISL_19015176
Ryan i cna't find a query to catch it too, have u a suggestion?
+1 Germany
No new seqs
Hmm this one is interesting as it's appeared in quite a few countries - so likely circulating somewhere that doesn't sample.
Let's reopen and watch! Thanks for analyzing - I found it through github search 🎉 had missed it at first as it was closed.
*5 countries now, EPI_ISL_19060029 is imported from India
But this lineage has not been detected for more than a month.
I think it doesn't need a under sampled source to spread to UK, Germany and Luxembourg. These countries are near enough each other. It's already known this lineage is circulating in India now. But if a lineage emerges extensively in India, it will spread to Singapore soon. But it's not detected in Singapore yet.
Closing it likely dead
Previously there was a potential 3-BP GJ.1.2/JN.3.2.1 recombinant in #991, and now it gets company in another country.
JN.3.2.1--GJ.1.2--JN.3.2.1--GJ.1.2
Breakpoint 1 between 2940 and 3430 Breakpoint 2 between 11043 and 12788 Breakpoint 3 between 28210 and 28957
Additional mutations: A2443G, C3876T, A6646G, T6747C, T10723C, G19327T,C23191T
Orf1a:A1204V, L2161S, Orf1b: A1954S
T6747C,G19327T,C23191T are private mutations A2443G from a JN.3.2.1 branch C3876T,A6646G,T10723C from a GJ.1.2 branch
GISAID query: A17637G, T22928G, C7819G No. of seqs: 3(UK 2 Luxembourg 1) EPI_ISL_18969540,18969543, UK, 2024-2-26 EPI_ISL_18948961, Luxembourg, 2024-1-15
GISAID query for S:1143F branch: A17637G, T22928G, C7819G, C24989T (2 seqs)
This recomb shows that recombs with 3 potential BPs can be real.
usher