Closed FedeGueli closed 1 month ago
G6183A (rev, real?) , T9142C (rev, real?), C13339T(rev, real?) do not really appear in any XDV.1, they are a known usher bug. Usher fix those mutations to JN.1 sub-branches to avoid artefacts, but it cause recombinants having additional non-existing mutations then.
Hope @AngieHinrichs can specify out XDV.1 from JN.1.1 so that this bug won't affect the tree.
G6183A and C13339T are reverted while recombining, and XDV never got C9142T but Usher places it under a JN.1.1+C9142T branch, so 9142 reverts later.
G6183A and C13339T are reverted while recombining, and XDV never got C9142T but Usher places it under a JN.1.1+C9142T branch, so 9142 reverts later.
thx u and @aviczhl2
closing for now
Just two sequences but featuring four spike mutations worth proposing it here.
Defining mutations: XDV.1.8 >> T9892G > A23971G, A9715T, Orf1a:A3615V (C11109T), S:A67G (C21762G), S:N148T (A22005C), S:T240I (C22281T), S:R683W (C23609T) Query: C21762G,A22005C Samples: 2 Country: 1 (Taiwan) Tree:
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_326b9_7ed040.json?c=gt-S_67&label=id:node_7188833
Highlights: A67G is a C>G nuc mutation rare in the course of the pandemic (less than 100seqs) S:N148T has been successful especially in GE.1.2.1 and XBB.1.28 S:T240I was in BQ.1.24 and previously in an undesignated branch of AY.122 S:R683W should disrupt the FCS