strogonoff
commented
5 years ago On it. Theme really expects there to be a TC committee, going to release a more general version without these assumptions.
I suppose instead of generalizing jekyll-theme-isotc211 into jekyll-theme-isotc, we might as well generalize it into jekyll-theme-sdo next
On Apr 5, 2019, at 2:40 AM, Ronald Tse notifications@github.com wrote:
@strogonoff https://github.com/strogonoff , SASIL is a newly established SDO that needs a website. I've temporarily used the jekyll-theme-tc211 gem here since it looked nice and simple to port.
That brought up some branding issues:
Header: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11865/55579922-f7056380-574b-11e9-9f46-1d91647de2e9.png Footer: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11865/55579931-fc62ae00-574b-11e9-8bc1-b3a01a393bf0.png The rest seem pretty good though 😉
We may want a different design down the road, but not very soon.
What do you think is the best way with the theme gem -- should we duplicate it and rebrand it, or can we generalize it and use it for not only TC 211? (i.e. move the branding stuff into _config.yml)
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sasil/www.sasil.org/issues/1, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR4X-jEwQ4t0_uMxYx9W9WaHL8wPe3sks5vdkcmgaJpZM4cddGK.
ronaldtse
@strogonoff , SASIL is a newly established SDO that needs a website. I've temporarily used the
jekyll-theme-tc211gem here since it looked nice and simple to port.That brought up some branding issues:
Header:
Footer:
The rest seem pretty good though 😉
We may want a different design down the road, but not very soon.
What do you think is the best way with the theme gem -- should we duplicate it and rebrand it, or can we generalize it and use it for not only TC 211? (i.e. move the branding stuff into
_config.yml)