Open stturc opened 3 months ago
@stturc, after internal investigation and discussion it was identified that all the network resources should be grouped together, which was not the case with the NSG that was being created when user provided vnet_resource_group_name
. Hence the change in PR #328.
As this is the expected behavior, no further changes are expected. If you prefer to create the NSG in AKS resource group, I recommend you fork the repo and make the change here: https://github.com/sassoftware/viya4-iac-azure/blob/main/main.tf#L66
and specify resource_group_name = local.aks_rg.name
.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We just began using the code change from #328 and it broke behavior we had been relying on. We had been specifying the vnet_resource_group_name, vnet_name, and subnet_names, but were not specifying nsg_name and wanted it created in the AKS recource group and not in our vnet_resource group. It doesn't look like there is now a way for us to specify where the creation of the NSG takes place.
Describe the solution you'd like
We would like to see an option to create the NSG into the AKS resource group.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Code of Conduct