Closed fjrossello closed 1 year ago
I would recommend not scaling the corrected counts to million counts as in my internal tests, it seems to perform poorly (higher number of false positives, at least with the wilcoxon test). But running mast on the data slot (log(corrected counts) where corrected counts use minimum of the median sequencing depths across the datasets) seems reasoanble.
Thanks for your prompt reply and advice. Cheers, Fernando
Hi Team,
I am trying to use a mixed effects model (treatment as fixed and donor as random effect) to identify differentially expressed genes between 3 conditions with
MAST
. According to one ofMAST
's vignettes "MAST performs best with log-transformed, scale-normalized data that has been thresholded, such as log2(transcripts per million+1)" (See here for details). My question is whether it is sound to use log2 CPMs calculated from counts (counts
slot of aSCT
assay from aSeurat
object) that have been depth-corrected usingSCTransform
v2
(recorrected usingPrepSCTFindMarkers
).Thanks in advance.
Fernando