I processed the data as usual..... I removed high mito, high ribo, and nFeature_RNA outliers and then rand SCTransform (regressing out mito, ribo and cc) on the seurat object, then calculated PCs and ran FindNeighbors with default arguments.
Now if i run leidenalg with any resolution i get the same result. In this chunk I'm comparing runs of varying resolutions to resolution=0.25 and you can see that the vectors of cluster identities are identical. According to the algorithm, 6358 of my 6380 cells are singletons.
> for (i in c('SCT_snn_res.0.8', 'SCT_snn_res.1.2', 'SCT_snn_res.1.4', 'SCT_snn_res.10', 'SCT_snn_res.0.25')){
+ print(sum(pbmc@meta.data[[i]] != pbmc@meta.data[['SCT_snn_res.0.25"']]))
+ }
[1] 0
[1] 0
[1] 0
[1] 0
[1] 0
Louvain identifies clusters that are in line with what i'd expect.
Am I doing something wrong here? How do i troubleshoot this?
Hi,
Here's 10X data from 10k PBMCs from a healthy donor.
I processed the data as usual..... I removed high mito, high ribo, and nFeature_RNA outliers and then rand SCTransform (regressing out mito, ribo and cc) on the seurat object, then calculated PCs and ran FindNeighbors with default arguments.
Now if i run leidenalg with any resolution i get the same result. In this chunk I'm comparing runs of varying resolutions to resolution=0.25 and you can see that the vectors of cluster identities are identical. According to the algorithm, 6358 of my 6380 cells are singletons.
Louvain identifies clusters that are in line with what i'd expect.
Am I doing something wrong here? How do i troubleshoot this?
Here's my
sessionInfo()