Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
this is an enhancement NOT a defect, but there was no option to select that.
Original comment by jjb...@gmail.com
on 3 Jul 2008 at 10:39
enhancement with partial patch
Original comment by nicolas....@logilab.fr
on 14 Sep 2008 at 7:03
Added Timeline prefix
Original comment by larryklu...@gmail.com
on 25 Sep 2008 at 5:10
Original comment by stefano.mazzocchi@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2009 at 7:01
Are these things I read about adding and removing events at runtime in the
version in
the svn ?
I'm using the downloaded zip version, but all these snippets don't seem to work.
Original comment by litobyte...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2009 at 5:18
@litobyte -- the code snippet in this issue report is a proposal for an
enhancement
to Timeline. As of v2.3, you can not remove events. But you can filter events
so that
they will not show on the Timeline. See the filtering function.
Original comment by larryklu...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2009 at 5:27
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
@litobyte -- Pls don't use this bug tracker as a forum. If you have questions
about
the sw, please use the mailing list. Thanks.
Original comment by larryklu...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2009 at 7:04
[deleted comment]
Hi All !
I'll vote for this request! I have something about 500-2000 events in memory
and each
time I recieve a update, I'll remove the oldest [for performance/memory
reasons].
Together with this enhancement I see the following:
- getNewestEvent, together with delete - or - deleteNewestEvent
- getOldestEvent, together with delete - or - deleteOldestEvent
Even if there would be the possibility to remove an event, you must find it!
Having a
huge number of events, an enumeration operation would be too timeconsuming. So
deleting the oldest would be the best for me [but other may have other needs!].
Thanks a lot!
br--mabra
Original comment by mabr...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2009 at 3:52
You should call tl.layout() after deleting an event and the timeline will be
updated.
Original comment by leitao.o...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2010 at 4:00
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jjb...@gmail.com
on 3 Jul 2008 at 10:38