Closed clarkmoody closed 6 years ago
It is documented in the Electrum documentation, which is also linked from the post on the mailing list you mention.
http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/seedphrase.html
As this documentation is Bitcoin-centric, I agree we might start a SLIP for non-Bitcoin coins, but currently, I don't have a capacity to do that.
Clark: would you like to start a document like this and submit it to this repository?
Of course I knew you'd say that :-)
Since we already have SLIP-32, what number should this SLIP be?
No strong opinion. 33, 132 or any other fitting number you'll come up with.
Closing due to merge of #197
As with SLIP-44 (registered coin types) and SLIP-173 (registered human-readable bech32 prefixes), we need some place to catalog BIP-32 version bytes. For Bitcoin mainnet, this is
0x0488B21E
which produces thexpub
prefix on HD public seeds when Base58 encoded.Even @prusnak's BIP-84 fails to document the version bytes needed to reach
zpub
in the HD serialization. I did find a post on the mailing list proposing thexpub
,ypub
,zpub
version bytes, but I don't think this is recorded anywhere else except the source code of wallets. (Please correct me if I'm wrong on this count)The issue I've found is that multiple values of the version bytes will produce the same ASCII prefix when Base58 encoded. It would be nice to maintain a registry of those version bytes here.
As a side note: I'm hopeful that the adoption of SLIP-32 encoding of HD seeds will make this request redundant, but I don't see wallet adoption happening soon.