Closed panther2 closed 1 year ago
@saturneric I second this question - or is there an easy way for Windows users to replace the bundled GnuPG version with the latest one themselves - without losing 'portability'?
@saturneric
I second this question - or is there an easy way for Windows users to replace the bundled GnuPG version with the latest one themselves - without losing 'portability'?
Hi, you can just use the latest GnuPG binaries(all executable binary files located in "bin" directory) to overwrite old binaries. It will work.
@saturneric
That prior answer implies that you are going to update once you feel your own software creation "deserves" an update. However this is a good and easy workaround to update the needed third-party software. Thank you.
By moving to QT6 you effectively cut off users from places where they still use Windows 7. Whoa, encryption just became less accessible, what a great move. So what's the last version that works on Windows 7?
Thank you for bringing up your concerns about the compatibility of my software with Windows 7 following the move to QT6. I want to clarify the reasoning behind this decision. The upgrade was primarily motivated by the limitations of Qt5, which does not support OpenSSL3. Additionally, Qt5 has become quite dated, leading to less appealing UI elements and a lack of support for many modern language features and graphical library APIs. The transition to Qt6 was smoother in comparison.
However, I acknowledge that I did not fully consider the implications for Windows 7 users. It's been a long time since I've used this operating system myself, and with my limited personal resources, I can only focus on maintaining one main development branch. My general policy is to phase out support for operating systems that no longer receive security updates. The last version of my software that supports Qt5 is 2.0.10.
I understand this might be inconvenient for some, and I apologize for any issues it may cause. If there is significant demand from Windows 7 users, I am open to providing long-term bug maintenance for the 2.0.x versions. However, this will require some time to find additional help, as my current bandwidth as an individual developer is not sufficient to support two development branches concurrently.
@saturneric, I see that QT5 version is back.
However, 2.1.3 QT5 does not work on Windows 7. It seems you compiled it without targeting that OS as a minimum, so it tries to use KERNEL32.dll calls introduced in Windows 8 such as CreateFile2 instead of CreateFileW. It leads to the fatal error.
If I replace that call in libarchive.dll
, then GPGFrontend launches.
$ sfk.exe replace -pat /CreateFile2/CreateFileW/ -dir . -file *.* -yes
[total hits/matching patterns/non-matching patterns]
[003/1/0] libarchive.dll
109 files checked, 1 changed.
Some labels look odd, but that's another issue.
Also, some keyboxd.exe
stays in memory after closing GPGFrontend, which is not expected when we deal with portable apps, but that's another issue too.
@saturneric, I see that QT5 version is back.
However, 2.1.3 QT5 does not work on Windows 7. It seems you compiled it without targeting that OS as a minimum, so it tries to use KERNEL32.dll calls introduced in Windows 8 such as CreateFile2 instead of CreateFileW. It leads to the fatal error.
I use windows server 2019 to build this binary piece. And as you said, its binary env seems to be a little bit too new for windows 7. But the oldest hosted window runner Github can provide is windows server 2019.
Maybe we need to find another way to produce the windows 7 suitable one automately.
If I replace that call in
libarchive.dll
, then GPGFrontend launches.$ sfk.exe replace -pat /CreateFile2/CreateFileW/ -dir . -file *.* -yes [total hits/matching patterns/non-matching patterns] [003/1/0] libarchive.dll 109 files checked, 1 changed.
Some labels look odd, but that's another issue.
You can now set the option “Kill all GnuPG daemon ...” at GnuPG Controller to True, it may solve the keyboxd.exe
problem.
Also, some
keyboxd.exe
stays in memory after closing GPGFrontend, which is not expected when we deal with portable apps, but that's another issue too.
And @sergeevabc, could you please copy all these releated info to a new issue? We can track these things properly then.
And @sergeevabc, could you please copy all these releated info to a new issue? We can track these things properly then.
Okay.
Hey, I came to know GpgFrontend only by today - and yes, it looks great.
One question, though - I noticed that the current release-zip comes with GnuPG 2.3.6.
So I wonder about your update policy... are you going to bundle the new GnuPG (currenlty 2.3.7) anytime soon? Or do you stick with the shipped version for some time?
Thank you.