Closed saurabhnanda closed 1 year ago
Folks, if anyone has a strong objection to the above proposal, please let me know.
@ivb-supercede @tfausak @jappeace @tchoutri
Please tag any other active users of odd-jobs as well.
LGTM :+1:
would be nice this could be changed without breaking existing code
@jappeace if the fields of Config
are changed but the type-signature of OddJobs.ConfigBuilder.mkConfig
is maintained, even , would that work for you?
cc: @tfausak
I think that's fine.
Currently there are only two options here:
cfgDeleteSuccessfulJobs
:True
orFalse
I propose something like the following:
Use cases