Diktat should recognize Detekt-specific suppressions

[0x6675636b796f75676974687562]

There's a lot of similarity between Diktat and Detekt checks, but the literals they're @Suppress'ed with are different, e.g.:

Diktat	Detekt
MAGIC_NUMBER	MagicNumber
TOO_MANY_PARAMETERS	LongParameterList
TOO_LONG_FUNCTION	LongMethod
LONG_LINE	MaxLineLength

When both syntax checkers are enabled in the same project, this leads to extra verbose lists of @Suppress arguments, e.g.:

@Suppress("MAGIC_NUMBER", "MagicNumber")
fun f() {
    g(42)
}

Diktat should be Detekt-compatible and understand Detekt-specific check names.

Environment information

• diktat version: 1.2.4.2

Related

• 1628

• 1530

@petertrr, @nulls, feel free to comment.

[kgevorkyan]

Maybe not get attached specifically to detekt, but support some common configuration/interface for all rules, which will currently contain at least one field aliases, as suggested for literals in https://github.com/saveourtool/diktat/issues/1628?

Thus, we can add aliases not only for detekt but for some other tools?

Also, we could add some short names for long suppressions via such configuration

@Suppress("SOME_UGLY_AND_LONG_WARNING")
fun foo() {
}

@Suppress("SHORT_NAME")
fun foo() {
}

where SHORT_NAME could be the short alias for SOME_UGLY_AND_LONG_WARNING?

[0x6675636b796f75676974687562]

@kgevorkyan, #1628 is not literal-specific, so if we proceed and implement it, each check will support aliases.

This particular task (#1627) is about the pre-defined list of aliases some checks may have.

[kgevorkyan]

Oh, now I got it, good