Fixed `KdocComments` for types in generic classes

[DrAlexD]

What's done:

• fixed case when KDOC_EXTRA_PROPERTY warning generation didn't take into account types in generic classes.
• added configuration isParamTagsForGenericTypes for @param tags creation for types in generic classes.
• added fixed warnings KDOC_NO_CONSTRUCTOR_PROPERTY for cases when configuration option are on, and then generic types must have @param tags in class-KDoc. Additionally added logic for replacing incorrect tag with correct one regardless of whether configuration is enabled or not.
• added new warning and fix tests.

Closes #1825

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: 15 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (626bac9) 78.15% compared to head (a72f496) 78.18%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...diktat/ruleset/rules/chapter2/kdoc/KdocComments.kt	68.08%	0 Missing and 15 partials :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1832 +/- ## ============================================ + Coverage 78.15% 78.18% +0.02% + Complexity 2432 2425 -7 ============================================ Files 131 131 Lines 8616 8631 +15 Branches 2174 2174 ============================================ + Hits 6734 6748 +14 - Misses 916 917 +1 Partials 966 966 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.