Closed nulls closed 7 months ago
Attention: 2 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
73cd9a7
) 78.39% compared to head (e8ff9f6
) 78.42%.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
...ourtool/diktat/ktlint/DiktatReporterFactoryImpl.kt | 0.00% | 2 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
164 files ±0 164 suites ±0 5m 17s :stopwatch: -27s 1 414 tests ±0 1 378 :heavy_check_mark: ±0 36 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0 2 793 runs ±0 2 757 :heavy_check_mark: ±0 36 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit e8ff9f61. ± Comparison against base commit 73cd9a78.
164 files ±0 164 suites ±0 6m 56s :stopwatch: -4s 1 414 tests ±0 1 397 :heavy_check_mark: ±0 17 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0 2 793 runs ±0 2 776 :heavy_check_mark: ±0 17 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit e8ff9f61. ± Comparison against base commit 73cd9a78.
As was recently discovered, there may be two instances of bash.exe
on a typical workstation:
%ProgramFiles%\Git\usr\bin\bash.exe
%windir%\system32\bash.exe
. This one starts the default WSL distribution if one isn't running, and has wslhost.exe
as the child process:We can use one or the other.
As was recently discovered, there may be two instances of
bash.exe
on a typical workstation:
- The one from MSys Git, typically
%ProgramFiles%\Git\usr\bin\bash.exe
- The one from WSL (if WSL is installed):
%windir%\system32\bash.exe
. This one starts the default WSL distribution if one isn't running, and haswslhost.exe
as the child process:
We can use one or the other.
I think The one from MSys Git, typically %ProgramFiles%\Git\usr\bin\bash.exe
is better (current behavior), since it runs Java on Windows instead of WSL
What's done: