Better series name

[gst]

NB NB : Changed serie items separator to '>'.

• Use a lock around work buffer : it can be accessed (read & write) by different threads. Previously we could lose some entries.
• More tests (92% covered).

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+28.02%) when pulling 2640df4527e34a06a73c9f8c5b4db5b02619b706 on better_series_name into ba7210255f8c81961dea541a09b4ba4d931da0bf on master.

[aviau]

I'll be taking a look at this Thursday. Thanks!

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+28.02%) when pulling 42dd5a992aa3d082675408989a221f1660638eff on better_series_name into ba7210255f8c81961dea541a09b4ba4d931da0bf on master.

[gst]

last little modif. after reread of myself. but shouldn't hurt you as it is really subtle :p ;)

[aviau]

I like the new series naming, but I think that the new brok tests should have been in a separate PR (atleast a separate commit so it's more readable). They don't send the good types of brok so they should fail.

plus... they are all log broks.

For reference:

• unknown_host_check_result_brok with perfdata {'time_stamp': 1234567890, 'return_code': '2', 'host_name': 'test_host_0', 'output': 'Bob is not happy', 'perf_data': 'rtt=9999'}
• unknown_service_check_result_brok with perfdata {'host_name': 'test_host_0', 'time_stamp': 1234567890, 'service_description': 'test_ok_0', 'return_code': '1', 'output': 'Bobby is not happy', 'perf_data': 'rtt=9999;5;10;0;10000'}

[gst]

seems I forgot to finish the tests ;)

[aviau]

I'm working on them right now. Wait till you're back in the office :P

[aviau]

@gst I'll merge all tests that make sense, and we can work on the others later.