Given how the objects are monitored for attributes changes (Item.setattr "hooked"): we simply miss the objects that would be updated "in place", like with a list.append(..)..
Think to a way to also have those changes.
The "simpler" would be to explicitly mark/record when such a thing occurs.
Given how the objects are monitored for attributes changes (Item.setattr "hooked"): we simply miss the objects that would be updated "in place", like with a list.append(..)..
Think to a way to also have those changes.
The "simpler" would be to explicitly mark/record when such a thing occurs.