Open sayarinm opened 7 years ago
notations are mostly consistent. I have not seen sub-brick before, and slice is often denoted as an image with notation much like a function: I(x,y) for 2D images and I(x,y,z) for 3D images and I(x,y,z,t) for 4D images (3D + time). Also, you define N and R number sets but not W . a subscript i on page 4: should that be ith entry of a vector?
@sayarinm, can you please look into the question posed above by @inglis-dl ?
(Section 1.2 in SRS)
Please let us know if the notations used in the Table of Notations are consistent with the ones usually employed in the literature. Specifically, is the notation used for the "sequence of length of q of 3D real matrices" intuitive and easy to understand?
:star: Part of the Generic Evidence for Consistency