Closed jhoblitt closed 1 year ago
As I'm aware of a couple of modules, I'm usually not assuming something :-)
Anyways, we might just move the template()
part to the class parameter. This way, it's possible to pass in a string.
It's still a breaking change, but I have the feeling, that it's affecting less people.
What do you think?
Agree that it would be better to pass in a string - I would like to evaluate my own template with my own variables and the current behaviour does not allow this to work.
The general expectation is that one would be able to pass a string of content similar to the semantics of the file::content parameter. However, in this case it wants the name of a template and there is no way to pass in the content of
/etc/sudoers
as a string.