Should the main branch be renamed to `main` instead of `master`

[kamleshkc2002]

I'm Submitting a ...

[ ] Bug report
[X ] Tool/language/etc documentation request

Other Information

With most of the repositories moving to rename the branch master to main, i think we should also follow suit. If agreed upon, i can work on this.

[simeg]

Sounds good to me! Not sure how much you can do without proper access to the repo but please give it a go. I don't think anyone would disagree to changing it.

[kamleshkc2002]

yep, i cannot do much without having repo permissions. the least i can do is update the code references but someone has to clone the master branch into main branch.

[hugovk]

• [x] merge #299
• [x] branch master to main
• [x] @sb2nov changes the default branch from master to main at https://github.com/sb2nov/mac-setup/settings/branches

Then in any order:

• [x] Update code references to masterin main branch
• [x] Update code references to masterin health-check branch
• [x] Delete master branch

Finally:

• [x] Make sure deploys work

[kamleshkc2002]

these steps definitely make sense..

once the first 2 steps are complete, i can start on the rest

[simeg]

Ping @sb2nov 🏓

[sb2nov]

Just updated the default branch, thank you so much for driving this :D

[simeg]

I just verified that the deploy works. Great job everyone!