Closed RepellantMold closed 6 months ago
Hello RepellantMold,
Thank you for your report. You right.
Over the next few days, I will finish creating the necessary abstractions to make the effects code more readable. Then, I plan to look in more detail at the algorithms in FT2-clone and I hope to be able to correct your problem quickly thanks to your example..
Hello,
I found (an understand) the bug.
XMrs bug beetween linear and amiga period. I will make the changes as soon as possible.
printf("period:%d->%d, speed:%d now:%d",ch->realPeriod, ch->wantPeriod, ch->portaSpeed, ch->realPeriod-ch->portaSpeed);
period:884->441, speed:16 now:868 period:868->441, speed:16 now:852 period:852->441, speed:16 now:836 period:836->441, speed:16 now:820
period:820->441, speed:32 now:788 period:788->441, speed:32 now:756 period:756->441, speed:32 now:724 period:724->441, speed:32 now:692
period:692->441, speed:252 now:440
print!("period:{}->{}, speed:{}", self.period, self.tone_portamento_target_period, self.tone_portamento_speed); ... println!(" now:{}", self.period);
period:3873->3105, speed:16 now:3857 period:3857->3105, speed:16 now:3841 period:3841->3105, speed:16 now:3825 period:3825->3105, speed:16 now:3809
period:3809->3105, speed:32 now:3777 period:3777->3105, speed:32 now:3745 period:3745->3105, speed:32 now:3713 period:3713->3105, speed:32 now:3681
period:3681->3105, speed:252 now:3429
Can you try again with xmrsplayer and xmrs in version 0.4.2^H3 for amiga and linear freq compatibility please :-)
Testing it again with the version you suggested, and it now sounds correct.
Hello,
I have a very strange things. I'm using ft2-clone for test.
Here you find t1_remove1and2.xm
where i simply remove track 1 and track 2: music sound seems correct with ft2 but bad with xmrsplayer.
Then i decide to save instrument 2 in t1_2.xi
and track 3 in t1.xt
. I create a new project in ft2 then load instr and track.
Here you find the result: t1_copy_past.xm
.
Now sound is the same using ft2 and xmrsplayer. But music track is ugly for all.
Do you have an idea?
I don't understand the previous problem, but the auto-vib bug seems to be fixed in version 0.4.6
I'm just discovering the openMPT test cases. I'll try to take a look at it in the next few months.
Hello,
I have a very strange things. I'm using ft2-clone for test.
Here you find
t1_remove1and2.xm
where i simply remove track 1 and track 2: music sound seems correct with ft2 but bad with xmrsplayer.Then i decide to save instrument 2 in
t1_2.xi
and track 3 int1.xt
. I create a new project in ft2 then load instr and track. Here you find the result:t1_copy_past.xm
.Now sound is the same using ft2 and xmrsplayer. But music track is ugly for all.
Do you have an idea?
well my song doesn't use linear slides (something I admit I should've brought up first), and t1_copy_past.xm
has linear slides turned on
Do you have an idea?
well my song doesn't use linear slides (something I admit I should've brought up first), and
t1_copy_past.xm
has linear slides turned on
oops second time with the same problem! I changed a lot of things to have more abstraction and less bug in v0.4.7.
I'm going to take a little break because making an accurate player is, I think, absolutely impossible to succeed nor is this the objective of this project..
However, I think I have a not too bad result now. I'll have to motivate myself to make a little editor around the player now then include new "instruments" like i want in xmrs (SID Instr, Rob Hubbard Instr, Euclidian Rythms Instr and midi).
I had noticed that some portamento slides were off during a fast section when I attempted to play one of my latest songs that was released in XM format called Jaded Nostalgia (the section in question is at 125 BPM / 2 tick speed).
The module with just the part and a lot of channels removed so you can focus on the lead fast_port.xm.zip
Below are downloads to audio clips (since wave files are not uploadable :/)
XMrsPlayer (latest main branch)
OpenMPT 1.31.05.00
MilkyTracker 1.04.00
FastTracker 2 Clone v1.77