Closed hiranohachiman closed 1 year ago
hi, you are reporting the validset performance. can you please report the testset performance as in the paper?
thanks
Hello,
Thank you for your prompt response.
I apologize for the oversight. You're right, I reported the performance on the validset. Here are the results for the testset:
================================================================================
PERF - CHECKPOINT: LAST
================================================================================
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628458 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506232 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric loss: None
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628468 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506242 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric loss: None_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628480 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506254 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric classification: 43.83845357266137
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628491 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506265 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric classification: 43.83845357266137_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628513 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506287 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric localization: 80.66965826717293
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628524 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506298 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric localization: 80.66965826717293_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628535 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506309 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric localization_IOU_30: 97.46289264756645
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628547 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506321 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric localization_IOU_30: 97.46289264756645_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628559 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506333 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric localization_IOU_50: 80.66965826717293
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628571 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506345 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric localization_IOU_50: 80.66965826717293_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628582 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506356 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric localization_IOU_70: 33.39661719019676
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628594 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506368 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric localization_IOU_70: 33.39661719019676_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628605 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506379 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top1_loc_30: 43.02726958923024
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628617 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506391 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top1_loc_30: 43.02726958923024_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628628 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506402 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top1_loc_50: 36.0717984121505
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628639 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506413 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top1_loc_50: 36.0717984121505_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628651 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506425 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top1_loc_70: 16.189161201242666
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628662 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506436 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top1_loc_70: 16.189161201242666_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628673 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506447 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top5_loc_30: 74.97411114946496
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628684 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506458 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top5_loc_30: 74.97411114946496_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628700 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506474 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top5_loc_50: 62.65101829478771
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628711 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506485 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top5_loc_50: 62.65101829478771_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628723 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506497 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top5_loc_70: 27.252329996548152
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.628734 - 2 days, 19:51:04.506508 REPORT EPOCH/50: split: test/metric top5_loc_70: 27.252329996548152_best
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:31.630236 - 2 days, 19:51:04.508010 EVAL time TESTSET - CHECKPOINT last : 0:05:31.259713
DLL 2023-09-10 15:09:32.805445 - 2 days, 19:51:05.683219
Regarding the cam-method, I used "CAM over CUB using ResNet50".
Any advice on adjusting the hyperparameters to achieve results closer to those reported in the paper would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your assistance.
Hello,
I recently tried running the code from your repository and found that I couldn't reproduce the results mentioned in the paper and README. Below is the log of the results I obtained:
I followed all the steps mentioned in the README accurately, but the results differ from what is mentioned in the paper. Is there something I might be missing, or any specific steps required for reproducing the results?
Thank you in advance.