Addresses #122 by functionalizing out the burn-in period from Chum into a method for all simulations, and working this through Calibration and Attention simulations.
A couple open questions about this:
What to do about the dividend process during burn-in? Chum let it walk normally.
There are inconsistencies in how Chum and AttentionSimulation have been doing tracking slightly differently. Currently, there are errors when using the burn_in when doing the AttentionSimulation because of these discrepancies. Fixing these is issue #81.
The upshot is I need to talk to @mesalas and @gms158 because this change will effect downstream data output (and aggregation scripts) as well as upstream market behavior.
Addresses #122 by functionalizing out the burn-in period from Chum into a method for all simulations, and working this through Calibration and Attention simulations.
A couple open questions about this:
The upshot is I need to talk to @mesalas and @gms158 because this change will effect downstream data output (and aggregation scripts) as well as upstream market behavior.