[L1V2] Typos

[adrienrougny]

• p.1 – “that can exists” → “that can exist” • p.5 – “such as protein, a nucleic acid, metabolite” → “such as a protein, nucleic acid, metabolite” • p.6 – “An outcome represent a particular” → “An outcome represents a particular” • p.7 – “If A exists and B exits” → “If A exists and B exists” – “provides three logical operators, and, or, and not” → “provides four logical operators, and, or, not and delay”, otherwise the delay operator should be suppressed • p.9 – “the greek letter “τ ” (“TAU”) placed” → “the label “τ ” (the greek letter, read as “TAU”) placed” in order to be coherent with the way the other operators are described? • p.12 – “the number of instances of an entity” → “the number of instances of an interactor”? • p.13 – “involving only one entity, or outcomes of interactions involving one entity,” → “involving only one interactor,”? – “is intra-molecular . . . or complex” → is intra-molecular (i.e. between the same instance of the interactor) or inter-molecular (i.e. between different instances of the interactor).”? • p.15 – “the effect of an entity” → “the effect of an entity node”? • p.16 – Figure 2.22: “Example of a stimulation a phenotype” → “Example of a stimulation tar- geting a phenotype”? • p.18 – “of a absolute inhibition” → “of an absolute inhibition” • p.19 – “of a absolute stimulation” → “of an absolute stimulation” • p.20 – “Logic arc is used to represent the fact that an interactor influences the outcome of a logic operator.” Logic arcs can also link non-interactors (pertubing agents and logical operators) to logical operators. • p.22 – “a transport is therefore could be described as assignment” → “a transport is therefore described as an assignment” or “a transport could therefore be described as an assignment” depending on whether it is the only way to describe transport or not • p.26 – “the semantic of the graph” → “the semantics of the graph”? • p.27 – “In the Figure 2.41” → “In Figure 2.41” • p.29 – “all statement on Entity Relationship map” → “all statements in/of an Entity Relationship map” – “is splitted to represent . . . as shown in Figure 2.45.” → “is splitted as shown in Figure 2.45”? – “In the Figure 2.45” → “In Figure 2.45” • p.33 – “or as a complex subunint” → “or as a complex subunit” • p.46 – “on the on the interaction” → “on the interaction” • p.49 – “the large number possible” → “the large number of possible”

[tczauderna]

This issue should probably be split into several issues, one for typos and one for each bug

[adrienrougny]

Indeed, and this actually only shows the typos. Changing the title to typos only.