Closed adrienrougny closed 5 years ago
Yes, the modulation arc is a tricky one. I have never had a chance to use this one yet. I guess it is for the cases when the effect depends on the concentration. For example, low concentration leads to stimulation and high concentration - to inhibition. I saw cases when students used it as sort-of "unknown"/"uncertain" arc, probably not what it was meant for. Some clarification would be nice.
I agree that the meaning of the modulation arc should be made more clear (and we should also check how it is defined in AF and ER).
But by modulations, I intended to talk about all modulation arcs (including stimulations, inhibitions...). There is no subsection that groups all these arcs together.
Process nodes, EPNs, logical operators have their one subsection, and as a consequence, there is a brief introduction to those concepts. It is not the case for modulations, which are all put in the Arcs section (2.9). Should we add subsections to the Arcs section? (2.9.1: Flux arcs, 2.9.2 Modulations arcs,...)