Should mention using SBO for conservation expressions

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Some past discussions on sbml-discuss lead to the idea that SBO terms could be used to annotate a model to indicate rules that represent moiety conservation expressions. See for example this thread:

http://sbml.org/Forums/index.php?t=tree&th=1092&mid=4505&rid=2&rev=&reveal=

Currently, however, the SBML spec does not mention this idea. I propose that we add some text about it for L2v4. The text would be at least in the section about SBO, and maybe there would be mention or references in other parts of the spec as well (e.g., in the section on rules).

Reported by: mhucka

Original Ticket: "sbml/sbml-specifications//121":https://sourceforge.net/p/sbml/sbml-specifications//121

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=641982 Originator: NO

I agree with the proposed change and that it should be done.

Original comment by: sarahkeating

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

status: open --> pending

Original comment by: lenov

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=1045203 Originator: NO

I am accepting this issue as valid.

Original comment by: lenov

sbmlsecretary commented 16 years ago

assigned_to: nobody --> lenov

Original comment by: lenov

sbmlsecretary commented 14 years ago

This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 730 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker).

Original comment by: sf-robot

sbmlsecretary commented 14 years ago

status: pending --> closed

Original comment by: sf-robot

sbmlsecretary commented 14 years ago

status: closed --> pending

Original comment by: mhucka

sbmlsecretary commented 14 years ago

Reopening the item. Screw the damn bot.

Original comment by: mhucka

sbmlsecretary commented 11 years ago

I propose to close that one. It is not the job of SBML specifications to tell people what they could do with it, even less in the case where the result would potentially be an inconsistence between syntax and semantics.

Original comment by: lenov

sbmlsecretary commented 10 years ago

status: pending --> closed
Group: Reported-Proposed --> Rejected-No_action

Original comment by: luciansmith

sbmlsecretary commented 10 years ago

It looks to me like this ended up being rejected in the end, or at least died unnoticed. Someone change the status if I'm wrong.

Original comment by: luciansmith

sbmlsecretary / test-sbml-specifications

Should mention using SBO for conservation expressions #56