Closed sbmlsecretary closed 2 years ago
(as stated for l3v1: yes, you may flag it for anything, so that algebraic rules know what to do with it)
Original comment by: luciansmith
I agree with the proposed change and that it should be done.
Original comment by: luciansmith
The specification should say that the constant flag is with respect to the amount in all case.
Original comment by: ccmyers
I am accepting this issue as valid.
Original comment by: ccmyers
I am accepting this issue as valid.
Original comment by: sarahkeating
Should this be when hOSU=true ??
Original comment by: sarahkeating
I am accepting this issue as valid.
Original comment by: lenov
Original comment by: mhucka
This is a subset of issue report #3487945. Closing this one.
Original comment by: mhucka
Original comment by: luciansmith
Fixing the Milestone tags of old closed issues. (Though this is a duplicate, and we don't have a 'duplicate' tag, but oh well.)
Original comment by: luciansmith
Original comment by: luciansmith
Raised by Lucian during the SBML Editors\\\' meeting during HARMONY 2012:
Consider a model with a species with no rules about how the species itself changes (no reactions, no rules), with the attribute \\\'hasOnlySubstanceUnits=false\\\', and which is in a compartment whose size changes. Its amount does not change, but its concentration does. Is it valid to give this species the attribute \\\'constant=true\\\', or must it be flagged \\\'constant=false\\\'?
This is never explicitly stated in the spec.
Reported by: mhucka
Original Ticket: sbml/sbml-specifications//216