Closed jonnyreeves closed 9 years ago
Looks good to me :thumbsup:
Cheers! I should add some test-coverage for the classNamer before we merge this.
OK, now we have the ability to specify a testNamer
as well :) I've modified the unit tests to provide decent coverage of these options and created a 'customer_namer' suite which replicates the current / original behaviour.
Please let me know if you're happy with this and I can get it merged, bump the version and update the history in the README :cake:
I am happy :smiley_cat:
Hey @sbrandwoo; this is something I knocked together to satisfy #14; let me know if this works for you :)