Closed etorreborre closed 9 years ago
(A) this can't be auto merged ideas?
(B) would you prefer to manually clean the site all the time? I "fixed" that without updating the docs... I actually quite like the current behavior.
(A) no, no idea
(B) my use case is the following. I have a gh-pages website containing generated files for: the current official version, the SNAPSHOT version. When I use sbt with my current development branch, if I generate the SNAPSHOT documentation I want to be able to push it without removing the existing official documentation. This is why removing everything before a push is problematic for me.
Ahhhh.... good call. If it's automergeable I'll take it now, otherwise when I can fully context switch my current task I'll do this next. On May 24, 2012 7:23 AM, "etorreborre" < reply@reply.github.com> wrote:
(A) no, no idea
(B) my use case is the following. I have a gh-pages website containing generated files for: the current official version, the SNAPSHOT version. When I use sbt with my current development branch, if I generate the SNAPSHOT documentation I want to be able to push it without removing the existing official documentation. This is why removing everything before a push is problematic for me.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/sbt/sbt-ghpages-plugin/pull/3#issuecomment-5897816
The documentation says that the push task must not remove the existing files in the staged repository (because the clean site task allows to do that), then I think that this line should be removed from the synchLocal task.