Closed jsuereth closed 10 years ago
Review by @skyluc @havocp and @harrah (the protocol at least).
That's a lot of commits. Where do I start?
@harrah for now, just protocol.scala. The rest can be mucked with a bit. protocol.scala represents a starting point for our design/discussion.
I'd say this is fine to merge if you've pushed everything you are planning to. On a high level looks like a good bunch of changes.
I think the big challenge for multi-client is to transition from a command-execution engine to a model-view. Not in this PR obviously. I think we likely want to port activator to this new API and restabilize first.
Cool. Sounds like a plan. I'll merge this, push the next PR, and we can discuss what model-view means in this sense.
This PR updates the API which Activator uses (the high level API) to support multiple projects. It also consolidates the protocol into one file with a better delination of what is high level and what is low level.
We may need more requests here to fully support both IDEs and Activator at a high level, but this is a good start
It also brings in the start of the low-level API for sbt inspection type commands.
The rest of the code is slightly gunky (more cleanups possible) but working. This represents the next release in the series of sbt-remote-control (a 0.3).