Enable coverage when `viaIR` compiler flag is true

[cgewecke]

PUBLISHED at the viaIR tag

npm install --save-dev solidity-coverage@viaIR

853, #848, #790, #715, #417

Uses solidity built-in ignored by the yul optimizer to preserve instrumentation when viaIR is set to true. This should address all the insane optimizer config problems.

Coverage in the plugin's own tests is missing for an edge case where the optimizer has:

• right padded the hash to 32 bytes
• hash has a truncated leading zero
• hash is not duplicate (e.g it wasn't just pushed onto the stack by some other operation)

... we hit the first two conditions in the integration tests but the hash is a duplicate.

TODO

• [x] Fix last remaining test
• [ ] e2e test on Zeppelin with viaIR flag set to true and verify coverage is identical
  • timed out in CI ... too big for viaIR?
• [x] e2e on 1 inch (see https://github.com/sc-forks/solidity-coverage/issues/715#issuecomment-1431239520)
• [x] Add tests for file-level function declarations (weirdly missing)
  • will add in separate PR, (opening issue)
• [x] Check overrides on solidityConfig ... add test to make sure all cases get discovered
• [x] Publish rc and ask #853 to test locally
• [x] Check that reports for both test jobs get sent to codecov correctly

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (d3a5b37) 95.92% compared to head (62408ea) 95.77%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
lib/collector.js	88.88%	2 Missing :warning:
plugins/resources/nomiclabs.utils.js	90.00%	1 Missing :warning:

:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #854 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 95.92% 95.77% -0.16% ========================================== Files 19 19 Lines 981 1017 +36 ========================================== + Hits 941 974 +33 - Misses 40 43 +3 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cgewecke]

E2E tested against 1inch solidity-utils and got the output below. Compare with / identical to: https://github.com/1inch/solidity-utils/actions/runs/7756078740/job/21152695486

NB: there was a failing test that looked at gas specific values - to be expected because the instrumentation mechanism changed and there's some consumption variance.