jisantuc
commented
2 years ago The problem that CI reports is that developers are missing from the POM file. There are two possibilities for how that might happen. The first is that we don't have any developer metadata.
I ran developers from sbt locally after running the github task, and saw plenty of developers. Since the github task is part of the ci-publish action, this metadata should be available at publication time.
The second possibility is that while this information is available, it's not getting packaged into the pom file for reasons. I don't believe this is the case either -- I ran a publishLocal after github (not identical to ci-release, but I don't know that I can mimic ci-release locally). I got a pom file that looks like this:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<project xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>org.scala-exercises</groupId>
<artifactId>definitions_2.12</artifactId>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<description>Exercises Compiler Plugin</description>
<url>https://github.com/scala-exercises/sbt-exercise</url>
<version>0.6.7+142-792921bb-SNAPSHOT</version>
<licenses>
<license>
<name>Apache-2.0</name>
<url>https://api.github.com/licenses/apache-2.0</url>
<distribution>repo</distribution>
</license>
</licenses>
<name>definitions</name>
<inceptionYear>2020</inceptionYear>
<organization>
<name>47 Degrees Open Source</name>
<url>https://www.47deg.com</url>
</organization>
<scm>
<url>https://github.com/scala-exercises/sbt-exercise</url>
<connection>scm:git:https://github.com/scala-exercises/sbt-exercise.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:scala-exercises/sbt-exercise.git</developerConnection>
</scm>
<developers>
<developer>
<id>47erbot</id>
<name>47erbot</name>
<url>https://github.com/47erbot</url>
<email>developer@47deg.com</email>
</developer>
<developer>
<id>fedefernandez</id>
<name>Fede Fernández</name>
<url>https://github.com/fedefernandez</url>
</developer>
<developer>
<id>jisantuc</id>
<name>James Santucci</name>
<url>https://github.com/jisantuc</url>
<email>james.santucci@gmail.com</email>
</developer>
<developer>
<id>juanpedromoreno</id>
<name>Juan Pedro Moreno</name>
<url>https://github.com/juanpedromoreno</url>
</developer>
</developers>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.scala-lang</groupId>
<artifactId>scala-library</artifactId>
<version>2.12.15</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.typelevel</groupId>
<artifactId>cats-core_2.12</artifactId>
<version>2.7.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.scalatest</groupId>
<artifactId>scalatest_2.12</artifactId>
<version>3.2.10</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.scalacheck</groupId>
<artifactId>scalacheck_2.12</artifactId>
<version>1.15.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.github.alexarchambault</groupId>
<artifactId>scalacheck-shapeless_1.15_2.12</artifactId>
<version>1.3.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</project>I downloaded the xsd file mentioned in the schema to schema.xsd and ran xmllint --schema schema.xsd definitions_2.12.pom --noout to verify that the pom file conforms to the schema, and got
$ xmllint --schema schema.xsd definitions_2.12.pom --noout
definitions_2.12.pom validatesI did the same validation to the definition_2.13.pom file and it also validates.
So I think the note about a bad pom file is a red herring maybe?
The release for 0.7.0 failed repeatedly for an invalid POM file: https://github.com/scala-exercises/sbt-exercise/actions/runs/1791462712
I'm opening this issue as a place to dump debugging info