Closed mads-hartmann closed 11 years ago
@dragos | @dotta This is ready for reviewing :)
Started jenkins job scala-search-3.0.x-2.10-pr-validator at https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/scala-search-3.0.x-2.10-pr-validator/23/
jenkins job scala-search-3.0.x-2.10-pr-validator: Success - https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/scala-search-3.0.x-2.10-pr-validator/23/
Started jenkins job scala-search-master-2.10-pr-validator at https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/scala-search-master-2.10-pr-validator/24/
jenkins job scala-search-master-2.10-pr-validator: Success - https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/scala-search-master-2.10-pr-validator/24/
@dragos Removed the explicit super
and it now indexes annotations as well :)
Started jenkins job scala-search-master-2.10-pr-validator at https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/scala-search-master-2.10-pr-validator/26/
Started jenkins job scala-search-3.0.x-2.10-pr-validator at https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/scala-search-3.0.x-2.10-pr-validator/26/
jenkins job scala-search-master-2.10-pr-validator: Success - https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/scala-search-master-2.10-pr-validator/26/
jenkins job scala-search-3.0.x-2.10-pr-validator: Success - https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/scala-search-3.0.x-2.10-pr-validator/26/
I love it when I'm right! :sunglasses:
LGTM!
It's the second time you've looked at the tree traversal and found an issue ;)
Squashed commits. Should be good to merge. :+1:
Sorry, I didn't realize I have to merge it myself! Done!
Thanks! If you want to lessen @dotta's code-review burdon for tomorrow you can review https://github.com/scala-ide/scala-search/pull/22 as well ;)
This fixes three issues
So it turned out that the failure that was seen with the string interpolation test had nothing to do with string interpolation.
Originally it only found one occurrence of
x
in the following example.I assumed that the
x
that was missing was the one inside of the string interpolation, but actually it was the argument. Ups.Fix #1001621