Closed ukstv closed 11 years ago
NOLITTER! PLS REBUILD ALL!
(kitty-note-to-self: ignore 20517977) :cat: Roger! Rebuilding worksheet-scala-ide-3.0.x-nightly, worksheet-scala-ide-4.0.x-nightly for 0ccd07ca, b42e2c3c. :rotating_light:
(kitty-note-to-self: ignore 20517977) :cat: cleaning up... sorry! :cat:
Except for a couple of comments, this LGTM. Nice reuse of the existing code.
(kitty-note-to-self: ignore 20726548) :cat: Synchronaising! :pray:
(kitty-note-to-self: ignore 20726548) :cat: cleaning up... sorry! :cat:
(kitty-note-to-self: ignore 20726737) :cat: Roger! Rebuilding worksheet-scala-ide-3.0.x-nightly, worksheet-scala-ide-4.0.x-nightly for 0ccd07ca, b42e2c3c. :rotating_light:
(kitty-note-to-self: ignore 20727096) worksheet-scala-ide-3.0.x-nightly:
worksheet-scala-ide-4.0.x-nightly:
(kitty-note-to-self: ignore 20726737) :cat: cleaning up... sorry! :cat:
PLS SYNCH
(kitty-note-to-self: ignore 20728499) :cat: Synchronaising! :pray:
It seems I have to merge it with the latest master again :) I will do it by the end of the week, ok?
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
ok to test
add to whitelist
retest this please
@ukstv Looks like this PR only misses a couple of really small fixes to get merged (if we don't hear from you in the next days we'll do it ourselves, it would be a shame to waste such a great contribution! :-) )
NOLITTER! PLS REBUILD ALL!
retest this please
Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results: https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/ghprb-worksheet-validator/19/
My bad, I've messed up the Jenkins job configuration last Friday. Should be good now. Let's give it another try.
retest this please
Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results: https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/ghprb-worksheet-validator/20/
Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results: https://jenkins.scala-ide.org:8496/jenkins/job/ghprb-worksheet-validator/21/
@ukstv I just noticed there are 4 commits... seems like something went wrong during rebasing?!
@dotta Nothing wrong. I've done a usual merge, not a rebase. Is it a mistake maybe?
@ukstv I see. It's a merge commit + an additional commit, which was the right thing to do. Alright, the PR looks good to me. Now, I think we should proceed with squashing (one single commit should be good enough for the functionality provided in this PR), and it would be ideal if you could remove the merge commit and instead rebase on master, as it makes for a cleaner githistory - I could do this myself, in case you'd want me to do so.
@dotta ok, I'll do it tonight.
@ukstv Thanks!
I can squash and re-issue the pull request.
@ukstv, I'm closing this one and using #155 for the merge. Thanks a lot for your contribution!
New eclipse Action added.
Keyboard shortcut Ctrl+Shift+C now clears evaluation results.
Fix #132.